Scott Christian
Hero
So everyone can misquote everything I have said, here you go:
I appreciate people who don't want it in the definition due to gut reactions or some negative consequences. But the misrepresentation of my argument is, I don't know, just bizarre to me.
The definition of charisma for 5e is: "confidence, eloquence, leadership," and "... your ability to interact effectively with others. It includes such factors as confidence and eloquence, and it can represent a charming or commanding personality." Its related skills are: deception, intimidation, performance, persuasion.
So I will drop the whole thing once someone answers this question: How does confidence, eloquence, leadership, being charming or commanding work with things like species, cultures, languages, religions, etc? For clarification, I mean, if there is no universality to beauty, then why would there be a universal marker for leadership or charming or eloquence - especially when other languages, decorum, and social morays are involved?
- I think charisma should only be based on looks.
- I think charisma should have a one word definition - beauty.
- I think charisma can only be tied to pretty, and only in human modern-day standards.
- (Of course, all of this is sarcasm.)
I appreciate people who don't want it in the definition due to gut reactions or some negative consequences. But the misrepresentation of my argument is, I don't know, just bizarre to me.
The definition of charisma for 5e is: "confidence, eloquence, leadership," and "... your ability to interact effectively with others. It includes such factors as confidence and eloquence, and it can represent a charming or commanding personality." Its related skills are: deception, intimidation, performance, persuasion.
So I will drop the whole thing once someone answers this question: How does confidence, eloquence, leadership, being charming or commanding work with things like species, cultures, languages, religions, etc? For clarification, I mean, if there is no universality to beauty, then why would there be a universal marker for leadership or charming or eloquence - especially when other languages, decorum, and social morays are involved?