Ondo
First Post
So, with all the info we have now, here are my thoughts on PHBII classes.
Bard, Barbarian, Druid, Sorcerer, and Shaman all seem like obvious guesses. (Some might be wrong, but I don't see any reason to guess against them.)
This leaves I, T, and W classes. One guess would be Theurge (as the more spell-oriented cleric), Inquisitor (as the "deadly and dangerous" striker), and then W as another Primal class, to give us 4 Primal, 2 Arcane, and 2 Divine. Count the first 5 as old classes or concepts revived and the last three as entirely new, and everything seems to work out - except that there are no Psionics, which the Rouse seemed to imply were in.
If we assume Psionics are in, it seems fair to assume they'll have at least two classes representing them. So the I, T, and W need to cover a spell-oriented cleric type, a "deadly and dangerous" Psionic striker, and another Psionic class. Telepath seems like a possibility, though it might count as an old concept revived - maybe Shaman doesn't?
Bard, Barbarian, Druid, Sorcerer, and Shaman all seem like obvious guesses. (Some might be wrong, but I don't see any reason to guess against them.)
This leaves I, T, and W classes. One guess would be Theurge (as the more spell-oriented cleric), Inquisitor (as the "deadly and dangerous" striker), and then W as another Primal class, to give us 4 Primal, 2 Arcane, and 2 Divine. Count the first 5 as old classes or concepts revived and the last three as entirely new, and everything seems to work out - except that there are no Psionics, which the Rouse seemed to imply were in.
If we assume Psionics are in, it seems fair to assume they'll have at least two classes representing them. So the I, T, and W need to cover a spell-oriented cleric type, a "deadly and dangerous" Psionic striker, and another Psionic class. Telepath seems like a possibility, though it might count as an old concept revived - maybe Shaman doesn't?