Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Darkvision: Don't forget the Disadvantage & limitations!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 7425077" data-attributes="member: 6778044"><p>“Dim light” due to patchy fog is different than the dim light of dawn and the dim light of a moonless night, etc., and not everything needs a rule.</p><p></p><p>To me “common sense” which could also be described as “table consensus” is what the table agrees to in terms of things that aren’t covered in the rules. So your table might differ than ours, but it’s consistency at your table that matters. At ours, darkvision isn’t sufficient to read by, nor is a starry night. In fog, it’s not a hindrance. Mostly because fog isn’t a hindrance due to it being dim light, it just has similar effects with regards to being able to clearly see beyond a certain distance.</p><p></p><p>I adjudicate such things on the fly based on what makes sense to me, based on research and experience, including experience as a DM and running many editions and RPGs. But if somebody at the table questions it, I’m happy to explain my reasoning, and the table can decide if that will be the ruling going forward or not. The entire purpose for the rules to us is to get out of the way as much as possible, and to help us determine what’s possible and whether something succeeds or not. We’ll agree pretty quickly on a decision in the moment, and discuss the final rule after the session, recognizing that the final adjudication may be different than this single instance. </p><p></p><p>People at night, whether today or in medical times, use light at night to do such things. They build fires because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. We expect they’ll do the same here. If that’s something you don’t care for or wand to hand wave, there’s no problem with that. Our characters generally act the same way that people have for thousands of years. And while ogres, dragons, goblins, or whatever may not have existed, they thought they did. It didn’t alter their use of fire and light at night. </p><p></p><p>Most of the time, we address the majority of these issues with passive scores and mitigating circumstances. So being knocked prone might have other impacts, although most of the time it’s not necessary to worry about anything else. If you’re knocked prone into thick mud or deep snow, on the other hand, then you might have to deal with other things. Our approach is to roll dice less and focus o. The characters and the narrative more. </p><p></p><p>It has little to do with 1e or other editions, other than to adjust rules to maintain in-game consistency in the campaign that has been ongoing. The common sense aspect has to do with the here and now. If something doesn’t make sense to us now, then it doesn’t really matter what we decided 20 years ago. There are plenty of things that we have changed over the years. </p><p></p><p>So yes, we allow for much greater variety of effects and impacts than simply consulting a rule that says, “this is what happens.” If you are knocked prone into 6” of water, the whole situation is going to play out quite differently than falling on a bare stone floor. To start with, you’re likely to be grappled in an attempt to drown you.</p><p></p><p>And as far as I’m concerned, there’s very little that is automatic, no roll required. However, the majority of that is taken care of by passive scores, and unless the circumstances are significant enough, even disadvantage is usually not enough to alter the results, and thus eliminate the need for a roll. For example, you don’t typically need to worry about being able to stand. But if you’re on a ship that is struck by a large wave? That changes things. </p><p></p><p>We like the way vision works in our campaign because it makes sense to us. Right now it works pretty much as 5e describes, with a carryover from our long-running campaign that you can’t read by it. If you have disadvantage on Perception due to lack of light (not because of any other source of obscured vision) you can’t read.</p><p></p><p>We’ve been happy with that interpretation from the ‘70s and see no need to change it now. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are other games that do the same. I’m sure there are many that don’t. Probably most at this point, because it hasn’t been a part of the rules since 3e. So why would they if they’ve never played earlier editions? That doesn’t really have any bearing on us. What doesn’t make sense to us is that the elf suddenly sees differently because there’s a new edition released. Abilities suddenly changing due to a new edition was a running gag in Order of the Stick for a while.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilbranteloth, post: 7425077, member: 6778044"] “Dim light” due to patchy fog is different than the dim light of dawn and the dim light of a moonless night, etc., and not everything needs a rule. To me “common sense” which could also be described as “table consensus” is what the table agrees to in terms of things that aren’t covered in the rules. So your table might differ than ours, but it’s consistency at your table that matters. At ours, darkvision isn’t sufficient to read by, nor is a starry night. In fog, it’s not a hindrance. Mostly because fog isn’t a hindrance due to it being dim light, it just has similar effects with regards to being able to clearly see beyond a certain distance. I adjudicate such things on the fly based on what makes sense to me, based on research and experience, including experience as a DM and running many editions and RPGs. But if somebody at the table questions it, I’m happy to explain my reasoning, and the table can decide if that will be the ruling going forward or not. The entire purpose for the rules to us is to get out of the way as much as possible, and to help us determine what’s possible and whether something succeeds or not. We’ll agree pretty quickly on a decision in the moment, and discuss the final rule after the session, recognizing that the final adjudication may be different than this single instance. People at night, whether today or in medical times, use light at night to do such things. They build fires because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. We expect they’ll do the same here. If that’s something you don’t care for or wand to hand wave, there’s no problem with that. Our characters generally act the same way that people have for thousands of years. And while ogres, dragons, goblins, or whatever may not have existed, they thought they did. It didn’t alter their use of fire and light at night. Most of the time, we address the majority of these issues with passive scores and mitigating circumstances. So being knocked prone might have other impacts, although most of the time it’s not necessary to worry about anything else. If you’re knocked prone into thick mud or deep snow, on the other hand, then you might have to deal with other things. Our approach is to roll dice less and focus o. The characters and the narrative more. It has little to do with 1e or other editions, other than to adjust rules to maintain in-game consistency in the campaign that has been ongoing. The common sense aspect has to do with the here and now. If something doesn’t make sense to us now, then it doesn’t really matter what we decided 20 years ago. There are plenty of things that we have changed over the years. So yes, we allow for much greater variety of effects and impacts than simply consulting a rule that says, “this is what happens.” If you are knocked prone into 6” of water, the whole situation is going to play out quite differently than falling on a bare stone floor. To start with, you’re likely to be grappled in an attempt to drown you. And as far as I’m concerned, there’s very little that is automatic, no roll required. However, the majority of that is taken care of by passive scores, and unless the circumstances are significant enough, even disadvantage is usually not enough to alter the results, and thus eliminate the need for a roll. For example, you don’t typically need to worry about being able to stand. But if you’re on a ship that is struck by a large wave? That changes things. We like the way vision works in our campaign because it makes sense to us. Right now it works pretty much as 5e describes, with a carryover from our long-running campaign that you can’t read by it. If you have disadvantage on Perception due to lack of light (not because of any other source of obscured vision) you can’t read. We’ve been happy with that interpretation from the ‘70s and see no need to change it now. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are other games that do the same. I’m sure there are many that don’t. Probably most at this point, because it hasn’t been a part of the rules since 3e. So why would they if they’ve never played earlier editions? That doesn’t really have any bearing on us. What doesn’t make sense to us is that the elf suddenly sees differently because there’s a new edition released. Abilities suddenly changing due to a new edition was a running gag in Order of the Stick for a while. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Darkvision: Don't forget the Disadvantage & limitations!
Top