Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
(Discussion) LA+ race availability - read post first, please vote.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Knight Otu" data-source="post: 1576215" data-attributes="member: 192"><p>I should have made it clear that those where my personal feelings and the understanding of the posts of other judges. I don't think (and I may very well be mistaken) that many of the judges would be in favor of a full level/exp tradeout. During the more active times, full tradeout might become too easy for some people's tastes.</p><p> </p><p> Tradeout is quite clearly in the lead now. Do you think it would plummet in favor so much if it was not full tradeout? At -1 level, I'd think it would still be fairly popular, and a few of the current roster of characters could technically benefit from it if it were, by bringing races with a +1 LA into the fold, for a total ECL of 2.</p><p> </p><p> -2 may or may not be too harsh. None of the current characters can benefit from it right now, but could in the near future. I can't really tell why I would tend into this direction, except for the possibility that it might be a bit easier to fix if it is truly too harsh (Meaning, we could either warn everyone that, if they use it now, they might lose a level if we go to -1 from -2, or we could allow those who used it at that time to add another level).</p><p> </p><p> And, if I sounded as if I wanted to speak for all the judges, it wasn't my intention. I was just trying to give my impression, and worded it poorly.</p><p> </p><p> (And for the record, I voted trade-out, negative levels and racial classes)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Knight Otu, post: 1576215, member: 192"] I should have made it clear that those where my personal feelings and the understanding of the posts of other judges. I don't think (and I may very well be mistaken) that many of the judges would be in favor of a full level/exp tradeout. During the more active times, full tradeout might become too easy for some people's tastes. Tradeout is quite clearly in the lead now. Do you think it would plummet in favor so much if it was not full tradeout? At -1 level, I'd think it would still be fairly popular, and a few of the current roster of characters could technically benefit from it if it were, by bringing races with a +1 LA into the fold, for a total ECL of 2. -2 may or may not be too harsh. None of the current characters can benefit from it right now, but could in the near future. I can't really tell why I would tend into this direction, except for the possibility that it might be a bit easier to fix if it is truly too harsh (Meaning, we could either warn everyone that, if they use it now, they might lose a level if we go to -1 from -2, or we could allow those who used it at that time to add another level). And, if I sounded as if I wanted to speak for all the judges, it wasn't my intention. I was just trying to give my impression, and worded it poorly. (And for the record, I voted trade-out, negative levels and racial classes) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
(Discussion) LA+ race availability - read post first, please vote.
Top