Dragonbane Offers A Box Full Of Classic Fantasy

A modern update of Sweden's classic fantasy game.

1690926075696.png

It seems that RPG boxed sets are everywhere from online sales to the shelves at the local Target store. There’s something primal about cracking open a box and digging into a brand new fantasy world. Even if the majority of these boxes are built as starter sets that offer up a fun experience in the hopes that the table will buy a core book to continue their adventures beyond the one contained within. Dragonbane, from Free League Publishing, offers a full campaign experience in this boxed set much like their Forbidden Lands and Twilight: 2000 boxes. You can tell lead designer Tomas Harenstam is in for the long haul. There’s a heft to this box that caught me by surprise when Free League sent the physical review copy. Is Dragonbane worth its weight in gold pieces? Let’s play to find out.

Dragonbane is a modern update of Drakar och Demoner, aka Dragons & Demons, which blended elements of Dungeons & Dragons and Chaosium’s early fantasy work into a game that a lot of Swedish kids played in the 1980s. I’m not familiar with the game beyond what I’ve read in the introduction of the boxed set and a few interviews with designers but I can say that this game blends those old-school influences with modern designs such as 5e and Free League’s own Year Zero titles. Attributes set up the base chance for 30 skills which players must roll under to succeed on a d20. Classes determine which of those skills can be improved. Individual skills are improved in play by earning a check and rolling higher than the skill after the session. On the modern side, the game uses advantage and disadvantage, or what it calls boons and banes, to reflect difficulty adjustments rather than hard modifiers. Heroic traits are gained on a rare occasion in a manner similar to milestone levelling.

Players can choose to reroll if they risk taking a condition that affects their character such as getting angry or exhausted. Each condition affects one of the attributes and the skills connected to it and forces a bane on all rolls on that attribute until the condition is cleared. (For those min/maxers in the audience, Constitution has the least amount of skills and Agility has the most, so keep that in mind in play) This is one of many optional rules called out in an emerald green sidebar, but reading those optional rules made me want to play this game with all those switches turned on. They are one of the many things that help differentiate Dragonbane from the many wonderful OSR games on the market.

The art also puts Dragonbane in its own class. Johan Egerkrans is the lead illustrator here. His style is one of the big draws to Vaesen and he and his collaborators here bring that same aesthetic to this game. While most throwback games go for gnarly line art or weird doodles that wouldn't look out of place in a third period Spanish class notebook, there’s an animated quality to the art in this game that still feels of the period even if it's more polished and colorful. I think that black and white art can be evocative for throwback games like this, but the painted illustrations here kept bringing me back to the Rankin-Bass Tolkien films and the paperback covers in the fantasy section of my long gone Waldenbooks. That art spreads out through the accessories included in the box: the maps, the pawns, the pre-generated characters. Even the treasure cards have unique illustrations of just how much gold a player might find in a particular room.

The box includes a campaign that charges the players with looking for a magic sword. First they have to find the pieces of a statue that unlocks the tomb. Then they have to get the sword and put it to use against the forces of evil who want the sword for their own nefarious purposes. It’s pretty basic stuff but it’s very well executed. The nature of the artifact hunt gives the players the ability to tackle the adventures in whichever order they want except for the final confrontation. Each adventuring site is built for a night or two of adventure and while there is dungeon plundering a plenty to be had, many of the sites also come with rivals or potential allies to talk with during the exploration. Each of these NPCs comes with a character portrait and a well-defined motivation which help the adventures stand out from the usual dungeon crawls.

Should the players wish to keep going (or the GM wish to break up the storyline with some standalone adventures), the boxed set provides two adventure generators. The first has the GM roll one of each fantasy die type to put together some writing prompts for an adventure. The second are a set of solo rules written by Shawn Tomkin of Ironsworn fame that give one site something of an endless dungeon feeling. Perfect for players who miss a session but still want to get involved in a story or for those unfortunate souls who haven’t convinced their table to try something other than D&D that want to enjoy the world of Dragonbane.

I think this game is an excellent opportunity for GMs who want to play other systems but have tables that are too locked into D&D. A lot of this is familiar; dungeons, sword, magic, d20s, but there are some elements that are different. Perhaps if the table enjoys pushing rolls, for example, they might be up for some Tales From The Loop after this game ends. There’s also an appeal to a campaign that lasts between 12-24 sessions with options in the box to expand the story if everyone’s really enjoying themselves. I wouldn’t be adverse to more Dragonbane either with new boxes exploring new ancestries, locations and storylines. It seems ripe for playable goblins to go along with the duck people and the talking dogs.

Dragonbane offers a throwback experience that has everything the GM needs to play in one hefty box.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Rob Wieland

Rob Wieland


log in or register to remove this ad



aramis erak

Legend
Mixing Disney-style anthro animals into a traditional fantasy world is still pretty out of place in fantasty in general and RPGs especially.
There are entire subgenres of anthropomorphic critters... Albedo, Ironclaw, Jadeclaw, Usagi Yojimō, Justifiers, Other Suns, Hunter Planet... Ironclaw is classic fantasy as animals, à la Disney's Robin Hood. Jadeclaw is a variant of Ironclaw, essentially OA for Ironclaw. Usagi Yojimbō is samurai anthros. Other Suns and Justifiers both have mixed humans and anthros in a space opera setting; Albedo has only anthros (the big clifhanger was when
Erma finds a human spaceman, dead in suit
.

Further, D&D orcs in the 80's were essentially anthropomorphic pigs. A few other species were similarly anthropomorphized critters. Gnolls were essentially Hyena-men.

Traveller's first several aliens were also anthros... Vargr (norse for wolf), Aslan (Turk for Lion), Bwaps (literally 1.5m sentient newts)... Oh, and uplifted dolphins, orcas, chimps, bears and orangutans also appear later on.

Space Opera (the FGU RPG, rather than the genre) also has canine races, felinoids, ursinoids, Avians, Warm Blooded Saurians...

Star Trek RPGs usually have felinoids and avians, especially now that Paramount considers ST:TAS canon... We get the Caitians and Kzinti for felinoids, we see avians in TAS and in LD. And the Tellarites are originally "pig-men"... they've been retconned by Ent, DIS, LD, and P.

Japanese fantasy often includes animals in human guise, who, the more stressed, the more like their animal form they appear...
 
Last edited:

aramis erak

Legend
The ducks are like 75 percent of the reason I want this. It makes no sense, traditional fantasy world plus anthro ducks, how delightfully weird, the sorta thing American designers would never do, I want to see more European games now. Especially if they have ducks.
Uh, better check your sources. Last I checked, Greg Stafford was a very definite US Citizen since birth. And it was he who put Ducks into RuneQuest/Glorantha.

Ray Tourney and Steve Perrin (RuneQuest's mechanics authors) also are American.
 

Jaeger

That someone better
That said I'm not a fan of the roll low system or ducks. Still buy this for the setting and the sandbox and convert it to the game of your choice it's still a great value.

In my opinion Symbaroum solve the issues that I had with roll low systems by making all the rolls player facing. I was really hoping that the new DoD would be a streamlined, and cleaned up version of that; with more general fantasy tropes that would make it easier for me to insert into my own setting.

But evidently we can't have nice things.


Uh, better check your sources. Last I checked, Greg Stafford was a very definite US Citizen since birth. And it was he who put Ducks into RuneQuest/Glorantha.

The problem here is threefold.

Donald Duck, Daffy Duck, and to a much lesser extent; Howard the Duck.

It's just hard for many of us that grew up with these cartoon/comic icons to see Ducks in an RPG as anything less than a Silly Joke.
 


Yora

Legend
The problem here is threefold.

Donald Duck, Daffy Duck, and to a much lesser extent; Howard the Duck.

It's just hard for many of us that grew up with these cartoon/comic icons to see Ducks in an RPG as anything less than a Silly Joke.
I was always under the impression that RuneQuest and Dragonbane did explicitly reference Donald Duck and Daffy Duck, and meant it as a silly joke.

What else could it be?
 

(and because Donald Duck is big in northern Europe)
Ok so that's the real reason huh? I was wondering because this Scandi (and I think German?) duck-person obsession goes way, way beyond just this game and Runequest.

(I note that in this case "Northern Europe" must exclude the UK.)
Meh, it’s not really that weird. Anthropomorphic animals are a global staple of fantasy and fairy tales across cultures, because it’s a very relatable concept. Even D&D features PC races for anthropomorphic lizards, dragons, and several different versions of cat people.
None of them remotely as cartoonish/Disney-esque as duck-people in RQ though. They're generally just "normal-size humanoid with head and fur/scales of animal, maybe tail", and typically depicted in a vaguely realist way. Whereas RQ's ducks (and those of Mutant: Year Zero) are basically cartoon-style beings that exist in a non-cartoon reality, with limbs that wouldn't work, often eyes that aren't just oversized but also flat rather than spherical, and so on. I think liking that is mostly a generational thing where a significant fraction of Gen Xers seem quite keen on that but when you go down to Millennials suddenly it's a rather niche thing (I have no idea how Zoomers feel about, it's not something that comes up often).

It definitely fits with some games - TMNT for example, all the mutant beings are like that, it's not just the turtles.
 

(and I think German?)
While Donald and Darkwing Duck certainly have some fans over here, I think other animals - especially anthropomorphic cats (see "Die Schwarze Katze" from Ulisses Spiele) and, to a lesser degree, also wolf people (see Varg in the game Splittermond) - win. Generally, people seem pretty split about the question of anthropomorphic animals in games.
I'm personally not the biggest fan, and my thought w.r.t. Runequest was rather to purge ducks from the setting, the Warhammer 40K way. For Dragonbane, though, it's less of a problem, because it's not like there is a well-defined setting attached where ducks stick out.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top