EricNoah
Adventurer
Frostmarrow said:You've got to love EN-Boards. (Uhm... in my humble opinion.)
No, actually in a very real and legally binding sense. Check the Terms of Service!
Frostmarrow said:You've got to love EN-Boards. (Uhm... in my humble opinion.)
Dark Eternal said:Thanks again for the sig, Eric, and everyone have a great day!
EricNoah said:
To you. (And I know, all of the other "X is this way" statements are your opinion, too.) But I think with a little work D&D can be more than that -- it can tell more kinds of stories than just the one kind. I mean, I like reading both "hard" and fantastical science fiction. Doesn't mean one is better than the other. Maybe I like some high magic in one campaign and like low magic in another. I don't have to be just one flavor.
I love you guys.Piratecat said:It's a shared community, and it's one that I loooove.
Dark Eternal said:Thanks again for the sig, Eric, and everyone have a great day!
officeronin said:
Disagree. The high-level fighter who is able to just ignore the sword smack from a level one peasant who gets lucky is fantastic. D+D does not have a mechanic where the peasant can get lucky, and that makes it fantastic -- even if you get rid of all magic.
If you want "hard" roleplaying, play a skill-based system, not D+D. D+D is not good at everything, just as skill based systems are not good at everything.
OfficeRonin
Originally posted by EricNoah
You know, Dark Eternal, I have the power to give you a custom title that you might not like...
Originally posted by Diaglo
Sweet. Can I use it?