Oroz's motivations were inserted directly into his text.
"What is this? An evil swap meet? First we have a Warlord in a swamp, and now you clowns show up. I'm getting sick of this. We have a very long trip ahead of us, so if you guys would give us a break and get the hell out of here, that would be splended. I can't let you endanger the only person who has the answers I seek after all."
Simply speaking while they didn't say anything, a group of toughs show up around an old man who tells them he has to do something he doesn't want to and you know something bad is going to happen.
As for drawing his weapon, You read into that as far as you felt like, he did pull it out but kept the thing in a very casual postion that doesn't exactly scream "I'll Kill You!!!!"
Btw, I don't mean to be rude, but cut the "you guys were medagaming" stuff please. You can point an accussing finger at us all you want, but feel free to check out you first post when Rho and his gang enter in. Specifically your OOC post saying:
"This is not neccesarily a combat encounter unless you guys make it one. I do, however, need spot checks and actions/speech."
There is no way this encounter would be a "well I didn't want you to attack them and now you either murdered a couple of commoners or get party wiped by a level 50" scenario. You told us it was a possible encounter to begin with. It may not be the reason why certain characters pressed to make it a fight, but I think your blowing this thing way out of proportion.
Also, we may not know the circumstances involving Rho, but the old man basically said Rho killed alot of innocent people. First off, being held accountable for actions like that has very little to do with the evil/nuetral question. A nuetral guy is just as accountable for murder as an evil person is. We don't know its murder, but I do know that none of the PCs immediatly attacked Rho, so nobody was assuming he had murdered someone. However given what we had heard, it was prudent to convince these people to leave, less they cause another unfortunate event.
I mean come on, even if you don't trust the geezer, you're telling me normal good characters wouldn't flinch if they heard this guys eats babies?![Stick out tongue :p :p]()
"What is this? An evil swap meet? First we have a Warlord in a swamp, and now you clowns show up. I'm getting sick of this. We have a very long trip ahead of us, so if you guys would give us a break and get the hell out of here, that would be splended. I can't let you endanger the only person who has the answers I seek after all."
Simply speaking while they didn't say anything, a group of toughs show up around an old man who tells them he has to do something he doesn't want to and you know something bad is going to happen.
As for drawing his weapon, You read into that as far as you felt like, he did pull it out but kept the thing in a very casual postion that doesn't exactly scream "I'll Kill You!!!!"
Btw, I don't mean to be rude, but cut the "you guys were medagaming" stuff please. You can point an accussing finger at us all you want, but feel free to check out you first post when Rho and his gang enter in. Specifically your OOC post saying:
"This is not neccesarily a combat encounter unless you guys make it one. I do, however, need spot checks and actions/speech."
There is no way this encounter would be a "well I didn't want you to attack them and now you either murdered a couple of commoners or get party wiped by a level 50" scenario. You told us it was a possible encounter to begin with. It may not be the reason why certain characters pressed to make it a fight, but I think your blowing this thing way out of proportion.
Also, we may not know the circumstances involving Rho, but the old man basically said Rho killed alot of innocent people. First off, being held accountable for actions like that has very little to do with the evil/nuetral question. A nuetral guy is just as accountable for murder as an evil person is. We don't know its murder, but I do know that none of the PCs immediatly attacked Rho, so nobody was assuming he had murdered someone. However given what we had heard, it was prudent to convince these people to leave, less they cause another unfortunate event.
I mean come on, even if you don't trust the geezer, you're telling me normal good characters wouldn't flinch if they heard this guys eats babies?
Last edited: