Hardback or softback?

[BiggusGeekus]

Softback, but even among my own friends I'm in a distinct minority.

 

[Technik4]

Hardback

I also prerfer color pictures, black and white dont usually do anything for me.

Technik

 

[Buttercup]

Hardback, nearly always. They look better, they hold up longer, and I just like the way they feel in my hands. An exception would be something with content designed to be photocopied, such as floor plans or maps. In that case, soft cover is easier to use.

 

[arwink]

Option 3: PDF/Electronic.

I prefer to only print out the three or four monsters I need rather than carting along a whole book, softcover or hardcover.

 

[Capellan]

Option 3: PDF/Electronic.

I prefer to only print out the three or four monsters I need rather than carting along a whole book, softcover or hardcover.

Says the man with the milk crate of books

I'm a hardbnound kinda guy, myself. In fact, I prefer hardbound for practically everything except modules (and if the module is large enough, I'll accept it then, too).

Of course, the binding needs to be strong. Not like, say, Champions 4th Edition.

 

[Darrin Drader]

Hardback, thank you!

 

[Chauzu]

If it is a thin book = paperback.

If it is a thick book = hardback.

 

[Psychotic Dreamer]

Pretty much I'll choose hardback everytime, unless the book is under 96 pages, then softback. Hardback are better for hitting players with.

 

[Olive]

up to a certain size softcover... it's cheaper.

 

[Silver Griffon]

If it is a thin book = paperback.

If it is a thick book = hardback.

I absolutely agree.
I am down with the clown.