• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Has Anyone played the d20 Gamma World game?

PhantomNarrator

First Post
My Gamma World d20 experience so far

Dark Psion said:
Remember, not all mutations are good ones.

If you have access to D20 Gamma World/ Darwin's World/ Omega World/ D20 Past-Modern-Future and previous versions of Gamma World, you could put together a mish-mash of a setting,..

.. which is basically what Gamma World is :D

I haven't visited in a while, but while going through the archives I came across this thread and feel compelled to respond, as I have just started a d20 GW mini-campaign (running it as a break from my regular Pulp Hero game).

Dark Psion's comment is essentially what I have done, but I've also taken the steps to convert the old Marvel Superheroes Ultimate Powers Book as mutations. It's not quite finished but I have enough to greatly expand the list of beneficial mutations. Not an ideal solution for the harried GM, but it was a labor of love, as Gamma World has always been one of my favorite games regardless of the edition.

Unfortunately, I must concur with the comments here. D20 Gamma World is one of the worst incarnations of the game so far, I'm sorry to say. Not that there aren't some excellent ideas in it - Psionics, Cybernetics, Nanotech - these are all welcome additions, but they lack somewhat in execution (particularly psionics). The opportunity to play a synthetic PC is a big plus, but sadly, this is negated by the fact that mutated plant PC's are no longer available, even if some might prefer this arrangement. Me, I've always thought it was okay to get a little wacky with Gamma World. If I wanted to run a realistic PA game I would probably go with Darwin's World (an excellent resource for GW and a great game in it's own right), or Aftermath.

The Player's Guide doomed this game right from the start, in my opinion. The art was minimal and often poor. The focus was scattershot - why do we need community rules in a player's book? With the minimal amount of mutations (and I have all the supplements for it!) this is really an unforgivable oversight, or worse, a cynical ploy to sell supplements. If you're not prepared to do some of the work I've done, or if you just don't have older additions, you're pretty much on your own. I don't buy the excuse that player's should have a hand in the creation of their communities - I want mutations in my player's book, and community rules in my GM's book. This was a colossal mistake.

Which is too bad, because GW d20 had a lot going for it. Unfortunately the new features (biotech, cybertech, nanotech, robot/android PC's) don't outweigh the loss of many colorful mutations, the mutated plant PC option, or the sometimes dubious mechanics. The supplements certainly help, in fact they're all quite good, much better than the GWPH at any rate, but unless you have the older editions, Darwin's World, or are just a hard core fan like me, it's not worth the investment. Find a copy of the 1-4th editions and use that instead (just be sure to get the errata if you use the 3rd edition!).

So why am I running it? Well, I already spent the money on the books. I want some return on my investment! (Besides, I suspect no one wants to buy my copy...)
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Particle_Man

Explorer
I love Omega World, though technically it is now a 3.0 rather than 3.5 game.

Drama...pathos...realism...c'mon, I want the game with biped rabbits that turn metal to rubber! :)
 



Geek Messiah

First Post
Ghendar said:
I've heard some very mixed reviews/comments about it definitely leaning toward the negative and am wondering if it's worth picking up.

Was considering buying it, read it and then put it back on the shelf. It really didnt do the GW genre any justice.

I just didnt feel like Gama World to me (YMMV)
 

deadboydex

Explorer
If you're looking for rules and setting details that describe a world of post-holocaust exploration, danger and weirdness, then GW d20 works really well. If you're looking for wacky character types and a laundry list of "mutant" powers, then GW d20 is not what you're looking for. They toned down a lot of the cartoon craziness that most of the previous editions had, and I can see how that would disappoint some people. I wasn't one of those people, because that was never my favorite thing about Gamma World. Your mileage will vary.
 

Lalato

Adventurer
I played it and I didn't find it horrible as some would suggest. While it's certainly not the best version of Gamma World ever, it's still playable. It just doesn't have many of the more goofy (and admittedly sorely missed) things from some previous editions.

I agree with Billy it's a "C" or "C-".

--sam
 

I worked on the d20 GW line, so of course I know what the writers had in mind and see the pearls mixed in with things. I wasn't in charge, so the game didn't match my personal expectations, but the intent was earnest. For example, the community rules were included because a lot of people engage in community-building in GW campaigns, as they try to rebuild civilization. We wanted people, especially GMs, to have a tool to help with that. And we wanted it in the player book, so players could see how their characters could effect communities when making design choices.

That said, I generally find myself borrowing concepts from the core book and (more often) the supliments and using them to augment PA games run with other core systems. I do the same thing with d20 Apocalypse, actually.

If you want some idea mines, I heartily recommend the GW suppliments. Especially since you can often get them cheap. If your gaming budget is big enough, getting the core book cheap isn't a bad idea either.
 

Remove ads

Top