The moderation here has a clear bias.
You say that as if it were a complaint or accusation. If you created a website, and moderated it, your site would have bias: your bias. Morrus created a website, and it has a bias: his bias.
Perhaps you might benefit from reading some conservative essays with the idea that the owner of property - whether that property is land, or a ship, or territory in cyberspace - decides what to do with that property. (Whether the government can sometimes intervene, is a question with many answers, depending on whether it's a republican government, an authoritarian government, or something else.) Morrus is the owner. You are not.
Hunh. I looked at "Find latest posts". It looks like you're here to do three things:
1. complain about left wing bias and exclusion of centrists
2. make "get woke go broke" arguments
3. every now and then, as a distant third to 1. and 2., you discuss games.
"Green Ronin is gone. They've just based their future on a political statement and in doing so, just tossed out the majority of their market. Anyone who is conservative is now gone, most males are gone, anyone who is deeply religious is now gone. For what? A meaningless political statement." - Rygar, a year ago. Meanwhile, only last month, Correia and his fans discussed how to harass Green Ronin at cons.
"So your call, are we going to eliminate harassment or microaggressions? Do you have a business plan for how conventions and RPG's survive after eliminating at least 50% of its consumers?" - Rygar, in Harassment
"Conventions and game shops are going to all belly up this year, because eliminating everyone but certain subsets of left wing politics isn't going to leave enough people to continue, but we can do that." - Rygar, in Harassment
"Comics sales tanked after going this route, I've seen figures as high as a 91% drop touted..." - Rygar, in Race thread
"The problem there is that beyond some relative simple and common rules, harassment policies generally end up being trivial to exploit for gain or a legal liability.
Since a lot of harassment uses a very loose definition of the term which gives advantage to the accuser, widespread implementation of these policies can and will end up being tools. Want to win the Magic/Pokémon/Board Game tournament? Have friends watch the competition and then accuse your greatest threat(s) of harassment. People cheat at these events *constantly*, this is a better tool than any other they can use today.
In a similar vein, these venues will risk being targets for lawsuits with today's loose definitions being used. What is termed harassment by many people on the internet is very different than what the law considers to be harassment. The Honey Badgers lawsuit is a good example. I doubt most conventions can survive more than two or three of these events."
So you're saying cons will go out of business because they have anti-harassment policies, right? Just like Marvel Comics, just like Green Ronin?
How close are you, Rygar, to frightening Morrus with predictions of economic doom?