Vaxalon
First Post
Azul said:It seems to me that the fact that we have had so much debate over the issue is rather strong evidence that this is a neutral act. It has elements of both good (mercy) and evil (killing defenceless targets). By its nature, this is a morally ambiguous act. Isn't moral ambiguity one of the traits of neutrality rather than good or evil?
I can agree with that.
I can think of very few situations where killing something that is alive is a GOOD act.
Sometimes, killing something is a side-effect of defending yourself against it. Sometimes you are given no choice.
Being good isn't easy.