Tea Bee said:
>>>
2) To Mr. Mona / Paizo: If the demand was there, could you do something like this all the time, or were there special hoops to jump through (to have all those settings in the mag) that would prevent this.
>>>
I doubt that a regular magazine like this would sell in the numbers required to keep a magazine afloat (in the tens of thousands). I think there's a very good chance the Dragon staff might end up doing this more frequently, however. Be sure to send letters of support to
scalemail@paizo.com and let them know you'd like more of this stuff. I think as long as the support's there, you'll see it more often.
>>>
On a seperate note, while I'm kind of de-lurking, I'd like to express my wish that the wonderful people responsible for Dungeon / Polyhedron would stop being embarrased about printing Greyhawk adventures. It annoys me to no end that the bubble in the corner says, "ANY SETTING", for some adventures, and then the first couple sentances say something like, "Although this adventure is set in the GREYHAWK campaign setting..."
>>>
Embarrased? Never! For adventures that have a LOT to do with Greyhawk continuity, we'll put a "Greyhawk" tag on it (see "Tammeraut's Fate," issue #106). "Racing the Snake," in issue #105, should have had that tag, too. Sometimes, if the adventure is about as "Greyhawk" as the "Sunless Citadel" or any of the other WotC adventure path adventures, we might put "Any Setting" so as not to scare off people who worry about having to do a lot of conversion.
Honestly, though, most of the adventures in Dungeon ought to be adaptable to just about any campaign. At least, that's the goal.
We've got _lots_ of exciting Greyhawk stuff coming up. Lots of exciting stuff in general, but I've got two "major" projects in the hopper that I think Greyhawk fans will be talking about for a long, long time (assuming they both go off without a hitch).
--Erik Mona
Editor-in-Chief
Dungeon Magazine