Dr'anth Maleficus
First Post
i like the idea of the karsite from tome of magic. however i don't like the binder class or the inability to use magic. i was just wondering if it would be alright to remove the anti-magic but still keep it fair.
i like the idea of the karsite from tome of magic. however i don't like the binder class or the inability to use magic. i was just wondering if it would be alright to remove the anti-magic but still keep it fair.
the book also says you can't use divine magic which doesn't make much sense. and you can use psionics. hope this helps
Krupin, mind explaining why you included Incarnum in with Arcane magic? I always saw Incarnum more as a 'Divine' type of magic moreso than an academic Arcane manifestation.
Wizards: Could you give us your definition of incarnum? Is it considered arcane, divine, psionic, a combination, or a new form of magic entirely?
JW: Incarnum is energy drawn from living, dead, and preincarnate souls. It is magic, but it doesn't fall into any of the above categories. Spellcasters of all sorts, as well as psionic manifesters and warlocks, can all make use of it with the proper training. In short, incarnum is not a type of magic -- it is a substance that people can learn to manipulate.
that's probably my bad - i play a realms campaign and they recommend saying that 'incarnum' is the weave, to some extend. thusly, i felt it was arcane. so i do retract my bias.
however, the following in an early interview does indicate that we're technically both wrong, but i may just be a lazy researcher