About to run Entombed with the Pharoahs and I came across an encounter against a Hiecarosphinx (CR 5) named Keten Hamu. They don't provide a stat block for him, just hp and tactics. And a reference to MM 136. I looked at the 3.5 MM and found a flesh golem on that page. Maybe they mean Pathfinder.
Unfortunately Hiecarosphinxes aren't in any of the PF bestiaries I've seen, and only managed to find a PF one here: Sphinx, Hieracosphinx - Pathfinder_OGC
This guy is CR 5 so he might fit, but Hamu listed in the adventure has 81 hp compared to this guy's 60. It also mentions rake in his tactics which the PF sphinx doesn't have.
I could just advance the base Hiecarosphinx given and try to match Hamu, but than it wouldn't be CR 5 anymore. I'd much rather find whatever statblock the book wants you to reference (there is no Hamu stats in the appendices). Why did Paizo do this? Am I missing something?
Unfortunately Hiecarosphinxes aren't in any of the PF bestiaries I've seen, and only managed to find a PF one here: Sphinx, Hieracosphinx - Pathfinder_OGC
This guy is CR 5 so he might fit, but Hamu listed in the adventure has 81 hp compared to this guy's 60. It also mentions rake in his tactics which the PF sphinx doesn't have.
I could just advance the base Hiecarosphinx given and try to match Hamu, but than it wouldn't be CR 5 anymore. I'd much rather find whatever statblock the book wants you to reference (there is no Hamu stats in the appendices). Why did Paizo do this? Am I missing something?