I figured I would start with the Roman era misconceptions and work my way up to the whole "Dark Ages" myth.Cam Banks said:Me, I wish they'd stop using the term "Dark Ages."
I figured I would start with the Roman era misconceptions and work my way up to the whole "Dark Ages" myth.Cam Banks said:Me, I wish they'd stop using the term "Dark Ages."
Numion said:In the books it was about anyone who happened to be on the path of a knights marauding warband.
Is this in any way surprising to anyone?Emirikol said:I was watching a show on the history channel about the dark ages. One of the quotes that stuck out in my mind was that "Knights were more like Tony Soprano than Lancelot." Their job was to be enforcers and raiders. The only code was from the church that knew that they couldn't collect enough money whilst local lords were constantly pounding on each other.
Numion said:In the books it was about anyone who happened to be on the path of a knights marauding warband.
Whizbang Dustyboots said:If all these peasants are sitting around smoking blunts, no wonder they're taking the brunt of the suffering in the war.
Henry said:Yeah, I enjoyed that line, too.
Lovely Pig Farm ya got there. Shame if sumpin' happened to it..."
D.Shaffer said:Me? I rather enjoyed the lines they had about the Norse vikings, myself.
Griffith Dragonlake said:Is this in any way surprising to anyone?
Celebrim said:It's precisely because of that that I'm inclined to distrust it. It seems every age wants to repaint history to suit itself. When what we discover from history is precisely what we expect to discover, it really worries me. Why should I be inclined to think that the current spin is any less spin than the romantic view of the knight as chivilric idea?
Emirikol said:I think that let's D&D paladins and knights off the hook!
Thoughts?