HalfElfSorcerer
First Post
In my opinion, the PHB describes alignments to their extremes. For example, all the evil alignments describe people who are pretty much all evil, all the time. But a commoner who is evil is probably not going to go around looting and pillaging all the time. He is going to slander his neighbors, whack kids coming into his yard with a stick, and leave the tavern without paying. He might even have a soft spot, towards, for example, beggars. He would let a poor man into his store and give him a loaf of bread even if he would fail to give the prince the time of day.
Likewise, not all lawful good creatures are always the apotheosis of Heironeus. They could be a bit greedy, be rude to drunkards, or spank their kids. So these "Pal-Assassins" are quite possibly lawful good. A manic devotion to their cause has made them forget one - only one - of their original tenents, namely not killing innocents. They would of course, try and scare people away. But if a hardier-than-normal farmer showed up, and got too far into said warded area, they would have to kill him - all in the name of what is lawful and good.
Likewise, not all lawful good creatures are always the apotheosis of Heironeus. They could be a bit greedy, be rude to drunkards, or spank their kids. So these "Pal-Assassins" are quite possibly lawful good. A manic devotion to their cause has made them forget one - only one - of their original tenents, namely not killing innocents. They would of course, try and scare people away. But if a hardier-than-normal farmer showed up, and got too far into said warded area, they would have to kill him - all in the name of what is lawful and good.