This Effin’ GM
Hero
I followed it, I’m looking forward to all them fire takes on peoples takes on pineapple pizza.I just opened a Twitter account to complain about you talking about pineapple pizza.
I followed it, I’m looking forward to all them fire takes on peoples takes on pineapple pizza.I just opened a Twitter account to complain about you talking about pineapple pizza.
Except that unlike the pinapple thing those things happened and are not just theoretical. If you defend the stance that the only measure if something is offensive is when someone says it it, like what is used here to justify why a apology is even needed for saying colored, then you also have to defend those instances I posted for the same reason.
This is a very bad take.Again, congrats to that person. Their response to being offended will increase the level of racism they are likely to encounter.
Good plan.
I agree that a bigot is a bigot. I think you missed the point here, though. People who see such encounters but have not engaged yet have a much higher chance of a negative emotional response and can easily serve to push them to harden their opinions.This is a very bad take.
One person overreacting to something (and this isn't even case of that, except on the part of the convention) has never turned a non-bigot into a bigot, and it never will. At worst, it changes the talking point used by a bigot from some other thing, into the case of the person overreacting to something.
I would assume the average person would be more likely to think, "Wow, what an unfortunate miscommunication. This reminds me to be extra careful when talking about race."I agree that a bigot is a bigot. I think you missed the point here, though. People who see such encounters but have not engaged yet have a much higher chance of a negative emotional response and can easily serve to push them to harden their opinions.
Ask yourself what the average person’s reaction would be to this story now that enough details are out.
True. But it does in many.Explanation does not help in all cases.
I know it well, as wel” as similar cases here in Texas involv8ng the Spanish word for “black”.Its the na-ge incident from USC if you want to look it up. It was in the news.
No one is making the absolutist claim that it should be “the only scale”.Making "someone is getting offended" the only scale for when actual harm is done is ridiculus
I think the average person will think, “wow, these people are crazy about what they get upset about.” And “boy, did SFWA overreact. They must have real issues.”I would assume the average person would be more likely to think, "Wow, what an unfortunate miscommunication. This reminds me to be extra careful when talking about race."
Than, "Wow, I should be more racist!"
I do think these missteps feed the notion of a great big-bad 'woke mob' coming to make everyone's lives miserable at the slightest provocation (especially people who mistake anecdotes for actual statistics).I would assume the average person would be more likely to think, "Wow, what an unfortunate miscommunication. This reminds me to be extra careful when talking about race."
Than, "Wow, I should be more racist!"
That is a vitally important lesson that I wish I had learned a lot earlier than I did.You can’t control someone’s level of negativity, you can only control your response to it.