To be clear: I don’t think the action the SFWA took was inherently unjustified or heavy handed.* I think the action the SFWA took was unjustified in this particular case.
IOW, I wouldn’t have an issue with the SFWA acting as they did if the case were much more clear cut. But in this case, they hastily jumped to an unjustified conclusion, resulting in an undeserved punishment.
Is there some kind of past event I’ve missed that might have caused them to rush to judgement?
* except banning her husband (?) as well. That was out of line, IMHO. There’s a time to ban “known associates”, and based on what has been revealed, this wasn’t anywhere near justified.
IOW, I wouldn’t have an issue with the SFWA acting as they did if the case were much more clear cut. But in this case, they hastily jumped to an unjustified conclusion, resulting in an undeserved punishment.
Is there some kind of past event I’ve missed that might have caused them to rush to judgement?
* except banning her husband (?) as well. That was out of line, IMHO. There’s a time to ban “known associates”, and based on what has been revealed, this wasn’t anywhere near justified.