twofalls
DM Beadle
I don't agree with the argument that the only (or even primary) psychological differential between women and men is modern socialization. You can't remove 40,000 years of Homo Sapiens social evolution from the gene pool in just the last 2-3 thousand years in which agriculture has completely supplanted the hunter gatherer cultures. Men had to evolve to work together in order to hunt food, women evolved to work together to gather food, maintain children, and raise the children. This is a gross oversimplification, but as illustrated even in this thread there are instincts that predominate in the population at large that clearly illustrate these evolutionary patterns. Speak with any social anthropologist and they will be able to show you that we as a species are not only evolutionary creatures on a physical level but also socially, and in fact the two are intertwined so closely as to be inseparable.
My point with this is, in a brutally blunt fashion, is that men really are from Mars and women really are from Venus, if not exactly for the reasons explained in that particular book. Certainly there is crossover, but the basic sociological differences remain, and hence you are going to see more men playing at war (rpgs) and fewer women drawn to it. No, I'm not saying all rpgs are war games, but the connection is too strong to deny as combat is a central theme of most any RPG (even the Storytelling oriented World of Darkness games).
My point with this is, in a brutally blunt fashion, is that men really are from Mars and women really are from Venus, if not exactly for the reasons explained in that particular book. Certainly there is crossover, but the basic sociological differences remain, and hence you are going to see more men playing at war (rpgs) and fewer women drawn to it. No, I'm not saying all rpgs are war games, but the connection is too strong to deny as combat is a central theme of most any RPG (even the Storytelling oriented World of Darkness games).