Stormtalon
First Post
Hussar said:Certainly, and I fully agree with you that Mac should be supported.
But, that's not what this thread is about. CharlesRyan is claiming that because many groups will contain at least one Mac, the DDI is doomed to failure. This assumes that the DDI will primarily be made up of existing groups. I feel that this assumption is badly flawed.
The assumption may very well be -- but there's honestly no real way to tell. However, in at least my own case, I'm the primary DM of a group where I have to drive 80 miles on the weekend just to get down to them, and DDI would significanly simplify things (and save gas, heh). Still, bein' a Machead, not exactly gonna be an option.
Still, I was primarily responding to the more general point made by Dr. Awkward. Yeah, I've looked at the VTT stuff out there, but it's all got flaws that (at least from the initial videos) DDI seems to be addressing. I like the tile-based mapmaking. I like the character design system that lets you drop a virtual mini of exactly your character on the map. The 3rd party stuff doesn't have any of that, and it's not as tightly integrated into the e-book versions of the PHB/MM/DMG as DDI will be. So, at least from this Machead's perspective, the 3rd party stuff just isn't at all attractive.
Still I do try to be proactive and suggest solutions to the WOTC folks that would at least be an acceptable amount of "porting." I've mentioned TransGaming's "Cider" on the WOTC boards a few times so far -- but never seen even a hint that they're even interested in constructive suggestions.