Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Only in America
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pedr" data-source="post: 6274065" data-attributes="member: 33464"><p>I think the last few posts show the difference between the centrally set/marked qualifications I am used to and the standardised tests which were noted as the US equivalent. </p><p></p><p>English qualifications are content-driven, in that the curriculum is designed by educators to teach key elements of each subject, and then to test understanding and application of those elements. This seems to be different from a US approach which has parallel tracks - a curriculum designed by individual teachers or schools, and assessed locally followed by a separate test which is disconnected from the design of the curriculum. In one sense, English education "teaches to the test" at least from age 14, but the test is aligned directly to the curriculum and designed by and in conjunction with teachers and educators. I'm sure there are educational theories which differentiate between curriculum assessment and aptitude assessment, with the SAT intended to do the latter, but it appears as if this has the effect of influencing teaching as much as a central curriculum design without the same degree of teacher buy-in.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps these are differences without substance, but I still find it notable in comparing the systems.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pedr, post: 6274065, member: 33464"] I think the last few posts show the difference between the centrally set/marked qualifications I am used to and the standardised tests which were noted as the US equivalent. English qualifications are content-driven, in that the curriculum is designed by educators to teach key elements of each subject, and then to test understanding and application of those elements. This seems to be different from a US approach which has parallel tracks - a curriculum designed by individual teachers or schools, and assessed locally followed by a separate test which is disconnected from the design of the curriculum. In one sense, English education "teaches to the test" at least from age 14, but the test is aligned directly to the curriculum and designed by and in conjunction with teachers and educators. I'm sure there are educational theories which differentiate between curriculum assessment and aptitude assessment, with the SAT intended to do the latter, but it appears as if this has the effect of influencing teaching as much as a central curriculum design without the same degree of teacher buy-in. Perhaps these are differences without substance, but I still find it notable in comparing the systems. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Only in America
Top