Sir Brennen
Legend
No.
False!
Never!
Wrong
No he did not.
It's not the norm.
No.
Monty Phyton Fallacy?
Oh I'm sorry, is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?
No.
False!
Never!
Wrong
No he did not.
It's not the norm.
No.
Monty Phyton Fallacy?
ardoughter said:Would you not have to formulate the Fallacy first?
The ardoughter fallacy- the assumption that you need to formulate a fallacy before having it named for you.You'd think so, but you'd be wrong.
The ardoughter fallacy- the assumption that you need to formulate a fallacy before having it named for you.
QED
I vote that by the time this thread drops off the front page, everyone in the forum has a fallacy named after them except Rel.
ooh! I claim the Obryn Fallacy
"A person's posting in a thread automatically declares their interest in that thread's subject matter. It is impossible to both post and not care."
...Which is clearly false, since it's usually how I post.
There. It's formulated. I demand you start using this to win arguments on the internet.
-O
I vote that by the time this thread drops off the front page, everyone in the forum has a fallacy named after them except Rel.
I endorse and fully support this fallacy.
I'm demonstrating why your policy is false right now.
Apart from the other ways in which this thread has been elucidating, it has brought to my attention a massive oversight, which desperately needs correction: I don't have a fallacy named after me.
I intend to address this by pouting until such time as I get one.
Does that mean you won't post until you have formulated such fallacy, or are you one of those rare males that can multitask? Pouting and posting at the same time?