Sunderstone
First Post
Eric Anondson said:If advancing the setting is a slap in the face of fans, FR has been doing this since the first novels came off the presses with Doug Niles' Moonshaes series. The Time of Troubles once before took away PCs' accomplishments.
I disagree. Doug Niles original Moonshae Trilogy didnt alter much at all. Matter of fact I was surprised with the second trilogy taking place years later. These novels were a perfect companion to the setting IMHO. It gave you the feel of what it was like to be in the Moonshaes and left it intact for you to mess with.
Eric Anondson said:Sembia was once designated as a preserve for DMs to make it whatever they wanted, then that rug was pulled out from under folks when they changed their mind and decided to make an official Sembia. And it has been a longtime complaint of the setting that PCs only get to clean up after NPC mover-and-shakers get done with things. It's not new.
I also remember when they said Sembia was left for DMs to use, etc. This was a major gripe I had with the Realms getting too crowded with super hero NPCs.
Eric Anondson said:WotC would like folks to move up to 4e, they aren't sending in the SWAT teams to make gamers do it. WotC would like existing FR-fans to come along with the 4e FRCS, but they aren't going to arm twist people into doing it. There is enough material published out there now that people can keep playing 3.x FR, just like when 3e came out there was enough material out to keep playing AD&D 2nd ed FR.
The atmosphere was what made FR great back with the grey box. IMHO, too many canon alterations from the novels ruined that feel. Even worse is that the heroes of the novels are still around in the games setting sourcebooks.
Why couldnt the novels just be novels for the most part with maybe a "Realms Shake Up" occurring only rarely? This would lead to less super heroes running around every area you want to develop further without having to come up with cheesy explanations to "well why cant we get try to get some help from Drizzt, its his neighborhood too" or "why is it every time we stroll through the Dales, Elminster just happens to be out worldwalking?"
Eric Anondson said:Personally, even with 3.5 books coming out for FR, I still set my personal FR in 1358. I just reversed-engineered things.
Thats fine for you. Not so much for me.
I liked FRs "original" atmosphere and open endedness, and changing things every time Joe writes a new novel isnt much fun. The "FR Completist" in me makes me research what happened in the novels I never wanted to read. From there I have to keep tons of papers/text files on what I want to keep from the new altered canon of the novels I had no interest in.
The Silver Marches used to be my favorite area (even before it was known by that name). Now from RAS Drizzt books, its barely recognizable and too busy of an area for me to want to work in.
In a way, I like the fact that they might be "rebooting" the already destroyed FR (thats my current opinion of FR and im entitled to it), but if the novels following 4E are only going to do the same thing again.... well, it will be worthless to me.
A perfect campaign setting is one with just enough open endedness to make you want to springboard your own campaign. Not one that feels like you have to play in someone elses campaign or you have to erase (or "reverse-engineer") parts of canon.
Do settings evolve? sure. Make more sourcebooks for every area or make new areas/continents/kingdoms. Maybe one shakeup every few years. Not with every novel that someone writes.
So yeah, WotC isnt sending SWAT teams out, but unless they change the way they do things (which I doubt) the reboot wont have much value.
Last edited: