While I understand elec's position on a player wanting to be able to look at the numbers, the math section is for the reviewers and always has been since LEW and old LEB (in LEW/oLEB it wasn't even required, just requested).
I'll turn the argument a bit around: How many folks are we losing because the template formatting for the math section drives them away? We have some evidence that it does.
I have also looked into this really hard and have not found a way to represent "oversized" in CB. (If anyone knows of a way please let me know too!)mohollaran - not sure if there's a way to override?
What he said.That is about how complex a template entry would be: or more specifically, a template entry area doesn't have to be complex, but it does have to be lengthy if it isn't. You can have simple or quick: not both. To get both, you have to increase the complexity of the coding, which means a lot of time invested on the part of the coder - which is not a particularly promising prospect, given that the wiki may die at any time.
But then it is still doing the wiki, and just adding more for those with DDI. That doesn't get rid of the wiki which is what is keeping some people away it seems.Mal's suggestion was posting both the CB file and the resulting CS in a wiki page, allowing those with DDI to open the files and those without to view the PDF.
mohollaran - not sure if there's a way to override?
I have also looked into this really hard and have not found a way to represent "oversized" in CB. (If anyone knows of a way please let me know too!)
r1, do you know of a screen shot of the iPlay4e character sheets? I really think those are a neat idea but I must confess I don't want to have to go through the signup process and do everything just to see an example.
.