If so... meh?
Having done a lot of research into Ravnica way back when I was writing Agents of Artifice, I have to say that it could make a fascinating D&D setting. This isn't anything I saw coming, and might not have been my first choice, but I don't think it's a bad thing, and it could be amazingly cool.
As for people wondering about working Planeswalker or "color magic" mechanics into the book... Why? I mean, maybe they're going to, but it's not remotely necessary. It is certainly possible--and I very much hope--that this is "Ravnica as D&D setting," as opposed to "Magic: the Gathering in D&D." If that's so, it would be about building the setting so it's thematically the same, but mechanically works around D&D rules, not M:tG rules.
If that's what they've chosen to do, I'd buy this in a heartbeat, for all that I might have preferred something else.
Baldur's Gate.That said, if they do announce a product that hybridizes Planescape and Spelljammer, that would piss me off.
From memory, Mearls mentioned in happy fun hour that the artifcer was in the process of being revised so probably.Is it just me who is expecting a new version of Artificer to appear as UA very soon?
So Nathan Stewart was just being a jerk when he tweeted the "...mmer" teaser. I'm happy for the fans of Eberron at least.
Baldur's Gate.
The Baldur's Gate games freely incorporated elements of both Planescape and Spelljammer whenever the topic of the planes came up. Perhaps most notably, Minsc's animal companion.I'm sorry, I don't understand this reference. Could you clarify?
The Baldur's Gate games freely incorporated elements of both Planescape and Spelljammer whenever the topic of the planes came up. Perhaps most notably, Minsc's animal companion.