Shemeska
Adventurer
Oh. Hell. No.
And I want to be able to call my demons tanar'ri and my devils baatezu, and my yugoloths yugoloths*. 3e used both 1e and 2e names, and life was good. We should stick with that. But we should also have the darker more mature look at the fiends that 2e Planescape gave us (and also that late 3.x gave us in Fiendish Codex I for instance).
*I already have daemons in Pathfinder, and Great Wheel NE fiends have always been yugoloths to me since they were named daemons for maybe like 2% of the page count that has covered them in D&D ever.
And I want to be able to call my demons tanar'ri and my devils baatezu, and my yugoloths yugoloths*. 3e used both 1e and 2e names, and life was good. We should stick with that. But we should also have the darker more mature look at the fiends that 2e Planescape gave us (and also that late 3.x gave us in Fiendish Codex I for instance).
*I already have daemons in Pathfinder, and Great Wheel NE fiends have always been yugoloths to me since they were named daemons for maybe like 2% of the page count that has covered them in D&D ever.
Last edited: