Copies of Spelljammer are starting to show up. Mike Long of Tribality is in receipt of the books and has tweeted some photos!
A first level background feat covers wild talents and could include those.And something that covers wild talents.
Although the telepathic and telekinetic feats of tasha could work, if you granted background feats anyway.
So you could chose to have one or instead get a different little advantage.
I think we just have different meanings of "tinkering" if that list above doesn't mean "tinkering" to you.1: Some classes not available.
2: Some classes with new specific subclasses only(elemental cleric, warlock templars, etc.)
3: Some new materials to make weapons and armor out of that can break, like bone, chitin and obsidian.
4. Defiling
5. Psions(and more psionic subclasses)
6. Dragons and avangions
There are some rules and subclass additions, but they've done that sort of thing with other settings. I don't see anything that would require rules tinkering, though.
Let's just say that it doesn't mean "tinkering" to any greater degree than we've seen in other settings.I think we just have different meanings of "tinkering" if that list above doesn't mean "tinkering" to you.
I think a background feat can handle a choice of either wild talent, defiling, or other feat.A first level background feat covers wild talents and could include those.
We have seen five classic settings (Forgotten Realms, Ravenloft, Spelljammer, Greyhawk via Saltmarsh, and Dragonlance upcoming) plus two new setting (Exandria/Wildmount and Radiant Citadel) three official MTG settings (Ravnica, Theros, and Strixhaven) and four unofficial MTG settings (Zendikar, Innistrad, Dominaria and Ixalan). We have a clear picture of what WotC sees settings as and what they are willing to allow/disallow in them. So far, the only thing wotc is willing to do is restrict races. There isn't a single setting that has restricted classes or subclasses, and Theros (the ancient Greek setting) couldn't even be bothered to remove crossbows and full plate. There is a less than zero chance that Dark Sun 5e won't support every class and subclass in the PHB with a hearty dose of "reflavor it" to explain bone plate armor and obsidian greatswords.Let's just say that it doesn't mean "tinkering" to any greater degree than we've seen in other settings.
Restricting class access is one of the things they suggest to DMs in the DMG. Just because none of the settings to date have had reason for such a restriction, doesn't mean that the company is against it and won't do it in the future. You can ASSUME that they have some sort of phobia of restrictions, but nothing they have done actually says that.We have seen five classic settings (Forgotten Realms, Ravenloft, Spelljammer, Greyhawk via Saltmarsh, and Dragonlance upcoming) plus two new setting (Exandria/Wildmount and Radiant Citadel) three official MTG settings (Ravnica, Theros, and Strixhaven) and four unofficial MTG settings (Zendikar, Innistrad, Dominaria and Ixalan). We have a clear picture of what WotC sees settings as and what they are willing to allow/disallow in them. So far, the only thing wotc is willing to do is restrict races. There isn't a single setting that has restricted classes or subclasses, and Theros (the ancient Greek setting) couldn't even be bothered to remove crossbows and full plate. There is a less than zero chance that Dark Sun 5e won't support every class and subclass in the PHB with a hearty dose of "reflavor it" to explain bone plate armor and obsidian greatswords.
Hmm... Maybe WotC should just forget Athas and make Doomspace its own setting, pillaging the good stuff from Dark Sun and avoiding all the grognards who can't accept spellcasting bards in Athas...
I completely agree. If they're not willing to do Dark Sun the way it creatively deserves, let it go. Doomsday seems like a potentially awesome, and most importantly, different setting.We have seen five classic settings (Forgotten Realms, Ravenloft, Spelljammer, Greyhawk via Saltmarsh, and Dragonlance upcoming) plus two new setting (Exandria/Wildmount and Radiant Citadel) three official MTG settings (Ravnica, Theros, and Strixhaven) and four unofficial MTG settings (Zendikar, Innistrad, Dominaria and Ixalan). We have a clear picture of what WotC sees settings as and what they are willing to allow/disallow in them. So far, the only thing wotc is willing to do is restrict races. There isn't a single setting that has restricted classes or subclasses, and Theros (the ancient Greek setting) couldn't even be bothered to remove crossbows and full plate. There is a less than zero chance that Dark Sun 5e won't support every class and subclass in the PHB with a hearty dose of "reflavor it" to explain bone plate armor and obsidian greatswords.
Hmm... Maybe WotC should just forget Athas and make Doomspace its own setting, pillaging the good stuff from Dark Sun and avoiding all the grognards who can't accept spellcasting bards in Athas...
Exactly. Trouble is everyone has their own take and the only one that matters to WotC is WotC's. Opinions run the gamut from as long as it's got the name Dark Sun and Athas and is published by WotC, it's Dark Sun...to unless it's a slavish reproduction of the original with only required mechanical updates and no fluff changes at all, it's not Dark Sun. Admittedly I'm way closer to the latter than the former.I completely agree. If they're not willing to do Dark Sun the way it creatively deserves, let it go. Doomsday seems like a potentially awesome, and most importantly, different setting.
I still want Dark Sun on the DMsguild though.