I'd rather these spells be useful to casters of all sizes. One possible house-rule I'm considering is having creature-centred emanation spells emanate from each grid-intersection within/bordering their space, their radii overlapping.Someone said:Actually the rules are clear. You pick a grid intersection as the spells' point of origin (or, I suppose, a point in space, if you don't use a grid) and the spell bursts/emanates from there, whithout provisions or special rules for big casters.
MarkB said:I'd rather these spells be useful to casters of all sizes. One possible house-rule I'm considering is having creature-centred emanation spells emanate from each grid-intersection within/bordering their space, their radii overlapping.
entr0py said:wonderful, then kindly move your idea to the "house rules" section.
If a creature too large to fit into the spell’s area is the subject of the spell, the spell acts as a normal protection from evil spell for that creature only.
Plane Sailing said:Moderator:
Putting a winky in doesn't make this kind of comment any less dismissive. Please don't do it again.
When someone opens a discussion upon how to interpret a ruling, there's every chance he's doing so because he's not entirely happy with the way he thinks that ruling is supposed to work - especially if the rule in question is, indeed, cumbersome. Offering suggestions for alternative methods can be useful in such situations, and the polite place to do that is wherever the question was asked, not in some other forum that the OP may not even read.entr0py said:'twas no offense intended. My apology for seeming harsh.
It is, however, disappointing when searching this forum for actual Q/A on Rules, and discussion is muddied with multiple house rule interpretations and various likes and dislikes. There are separate forums for that after all.
I'll attempt to phrase my reminders friendlier in the future. (winky appropriate here)