I don't think that was implied at all. Recognizing many of the nuances mentioned in this thread takes practice. It's quite possible for an unpracticed person to not recognize the sounds they're actually making, and in fact our brains work in such a way that as we acquire a language we lose the ability to even hear certain differences unless they're distinct phonemes within that language. In any case you seem to be taking the discussion personally, so I'll leave it alone.SUBSEQUENTLY, not germane to the meat of the discussion, some asserted that I couldn't honestly be pronouncing the words I cited as counterexamples in the way my sources say they should be pronounced, and that my speech didn't contain certain stops. IOW, that on some level I was being intellectually dishonest for the purpose of making a point in this thread.
I don't think that was implied at all.
Try actually saying any of those words out loud. Do you really say "buck eye" with a space there? Really? Honestly? That would be a very strange accent if you do.
It's quite possible for an unpracticed person to not recognize the sounds they're actually making, and in fact our brains work in such a way that as we acquire a language we lose the ability to even hear certain differences unless they're distinct phonemes within that language.
In any case you seem to be taking the discussion personally, so I'll leave it alone.
But compound words for places are a pain, because French does not work well with compound words : it sounds awkward and unnatural most of the time (it only sounds right for some combination of short words... there is no rule for this).
Yes, but Bill Bryson is a drooling idiot.Bill Bryson points out that addiing compound words to the english language is a particularly American trait.
Not quite.5thE just made a factual assertion to the effect that I was using my own speech pattern as the basis for my counterargument, which I wasn't.
Yes, but Bill Bryson is a drooling idiot.
Or droolingidiot, if you prefer.