I know another former WotC employee who said he knew what the announcement was going to be about, so I assume that the word went around. Of course, the "word" might have been misdirection.catsclaw227 said:I get the sense from a vague comment by Erik Mona in another thread that they did know something and with some time, they can make an announcement as well.
Then again, I could be wrong....
Eric Anondson said:Plus, for all we know 4e may be transparently compatible with 3e products. In that case there won't be a hard rush to redo everything already out there.
LoPaC said:Theres way too many posts for me to go back and re-read, so this may be already stated:
Has anyone noticed that all the dice have the number 4 facing up?
Marketing. Publicity. Headlines. Impact to drive sales.Olgar Shiverstone said:But if that were the case, why call it 4E? Why not just announce another revision of 3.X?
catsclaw227 said:I get the sense from a vague comment by Erik Mona in another thread that they did know something and with some time, they can make an announcement as well.
Then again, I could be wrong....
Erik Mona said:We're pretty much as in the dark as everyone. I have reason to believe I'll know more soon, but it's way, way, WAY to early to say what our plans are, because we haven't made them yet.
Pathfinder and the GameMastery Modules are 3.5 until 4.0 comes out. After that it'll be an issue of the terms of the OGL and a variety of other factors, including what our readers tell us they want us to do.
--Erik