Sepulchrave II said:**
Soon
**
Piratecat: Feel free to trim away.
- And thank-you, everyone. From my heart.
Avarice said:
Nope, I'm afraid you've got me there, grodog. I've only included the updates themselves, in order to keep the page count down. Even so, its up around 150 pages. I've been thinking about going back through and accumulating all of the clarifications in a separate doc; a task for another day, I guess.
Eridanis said:Responding to another comment above, I don't think it's a matter of 'maturity'; rather, Sep has a small group of four players to game with and construct the story around, while PC has a large cast of about a dozen characters (in various states of regular play) that are part of his story. The difference of scale has an impact on the style of story that is related to us on the boards. With PC, we can enjoy what each person is doing, why they're doing it, and follow the story from their POV. Sep can use the 'extra' space left by having a minimum group, and fill it with different POVs (as we've seen at several points) and more exposition/description in a novelic style. (Is novelic a word? Get me my OED!)
Axeboy said:
Yeah, 'maturity' isn't quite the correct word for what I meant, but I find that my vocabulary is frequently lacking the correct words; I think I used the 'mature' because Sagiro used 'adolescent'. Perhaps '...for his more philosophical players...' is a better way to convey the meaning than '...for his more mature players...'.
You're certainly right, though, about the size of the group having an influence on the style of play. I hadn't thought of that.