Oh, I think he would do another. He just won't attempt another 18-month shooting schedule, making all three films at once.Klaus said:Yeah, but LotR is precisely the reason PJ wouldn't do *another* fantasy trilogy.
Because Jackson wanted to do Kong afterward.Sandain said:I can't understand why they tore down Hobbiton when the Hobbit movie was screaming to be made. It would be an instant block buster and make hundreds of millions of gp... er dollars.
It was built on private land. The landowner would not know what to do with it. Even if he wants to charge tourist fee, he might get sued by Tolkien Enterprise and/or Tolkien Estate. Then again, he wouldn't want tourists flocking onto his property.Sandain said:I can't understand why they tore down Hobbiton when the Hobbit movie was screaming to be made. It would be an instant block buster and make hundreds of millions of gp... er dollars.
Klaus said:And then PJ pulls a "Lucas" and re-release FotR with the new actor in place of Bilbo?
j/k, I'd like a new actor to play Bilbo, and John Rhys-Davies to play that dwarf that is, iirc, Gimli's relative.