cmbarona
First Post
I stumbled upon this thread recently:
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19741874/Martial_Controller_Compromise_The_Ranger
This has given me food for thought. Is there some way the basic class features of the Ranger can be reworked so that it's a controller at heart? Or are their powers (with which I'll confess I'm not too familiar) so strikerish that they would require a complete re-working of the entire class?
In contrast to the thread mentioned above, I think the Hunter's Quarry isn't the only thing about Rangers that needs to be changed. Is there some way to keep the two-weapon and archery builds distinct? What about allowing companions for all rangers and reworking the other class features?
Thoughts?
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19741874/Martial_Controller_Compromise_The_Ranger
This has given me food for thought. Is there some way the basic class features of the Ranger can be reworked so that it's a controller at heart? Or are their powers (with which I'll confess I'm not too familiar) so strikerish that they would require a complete re-working of the entire class?
In contrast to the thread mentioned above, I think the Hunter's Quarry isn't the only thing about Rangers that needs to be changed. Is there some way to keep the two-weapon and archery builds distinct? What about allowing companions for all rangers and reworking the other class features?
Thoughts?