• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

[UPDATED AGAIN!] CURSE OF STRAHD Will Be Available March 15th

The new Dungeons & Dragons storyline will be called Curse of Strahd. I'm hearing that Tracy and Laura Hickman, who wrote the original 1983 Ravenloft adventure, have some involvement, and it will be set in Castle Ravenloft. The PCs will be sent to Strahd's realm by Madam Eva (using a tarokka deck). While the Ravenloft name is being used, I don't know if it's actually set in a demiplane or if it's set in the Forgotten Realms, but the land of Barovia certainly exists. More if I hear it!

The new Dungeons & Dragons storyline will be called Curse of Strahd. I'm hearing that Tracy and Laura Hickman, who wrote the original 1983 Ravenloft adventure, have some involvement, and it will be set in Castle Ravenloft. The PCs will be sent to Strahd's realm by Madam Eva (using a tarokka deck). While the Ravenloft name is being used, I don't know if it's actually set in a demiplane or if it's set in the Forgotten Realms, but the land of Barovia certainly exists. More if I hear it!




2400188-strahd.jpg


Ravenloft was originally an adventure in 1983, and later became an entire campaign setting set in a pocket dimension called the Demiplane of Dread. The original adventure, for AD&D 1st Edition, has Strahd von Zarovich, master vampire, as its main villain. The land of Barovia is surrounded by a magical fog, and Strahd rules the domain. The adventure featured an interesting card-based random generation process which determined the locations of items, NPCs, and Strahd's motivation, making the adventure replayable. Strahd was an intelligent villain who loomed over the entire adventure, taunting the PCs throughout. Strahd is probably one of the most well-known D&D characters, after Drizzt and Elminster, and possible some Dragonlance characters.

I don't know how much of that old adventure matches the new storyline. I hear that Strahd's love story is at least cited, if not part of the adventure, and that it is shorter in scope than the previous adventure paths. WotC has sent some preview images to various outlets, as I reported yesterday, and the announcement is coming on Monday.

Personally? I am really excited about this. I can't wait to run it! Out of the storylines so far (and I really liked the Underdark whimsy), this one probably hits me right in the sweet spot. I was hoping for this.

The book is on Amazon already, albeit with no cover image, and is available for pre-order. 224 pages, $49.95, March 15th , 2016. With these 'placeholder' Amazon pages details sometimes change; but here's the product description:

Unravel the mysteries of Ravenloft® in this dread adventure for the world’s greatest roleplaying game

Under raging storm clouds, the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich stands silhouetted against the ancient walls of Castle Ravenloft. Rumbling thunder pounds the castle spires. The wind’s howling increases as he turns his gaze down toward the village of Barovia. Far below, yet not beyond his keen eyesight, a party of adventurers has just entered his domain. Strahd’s face forms the barest hint of a smile as his dark plan unfolds. He knew they were coming, and he knows why they came — all according to his plan. A lightning flash rips through the darkness, but Strahd is gone. Only the howling of the wind fills the midnight air. The master of Castle Ravenloft is having guests for dinner. And you are invited.


Some more snippets of info:
  • There's going to be a twitter campaign hashtag thing called #DNDFortune during the lead up to the adventure. You can get a 'reading' each day from Madam Eva using her tarokka deck.
  • The tarokka deck will be produced by Gale Force 9 and should be available when the adventure releases. It can be used to randomise locations in the adventure.
  • The adventurers are trapped (I assume in Barovia by the mists, but maybe in the castle itself; not sure).
  • Mike Schley has strongly hinted that he worked on maps for the adventure, as he did for the previous 5E adventures.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

ccs

41st lv DM
Curse of Strand? I think you have a typo.

Here's hoping they get it right. Setting Ravenloft in the Realms would be an awesome way to f* it up.

Sorry, the damage was done back in the 90's when TSR shat out that horrid campaign setting & slapped the title of one of the best modules ever written on it.
Oh sure, they went on to wright some good individual modules & a series of even better source books with the various VR Guides. But the setting is still crap & it's rules worse.
(No, I'm not a fan of the setting. It ranks #3 on my D&D dislikes list)

So by all means, PLEASE set it in the FR. Or better yet, nowhere in particular - like the original module. And completely divorced from the Domains of Dread setting.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Nickolaidas

Explorer
Hmmm ...

I think ... maybe this is WotC's way of seeing if there is 'buying interest' for a new campaign setting? Releasing an adventure which temporarily teleports PCs from the Forgotten Realms to Ravenloft for *just* one adventure. If few people buy it, that's okay, it was one adventure and it will never happen again. But if many people buy it, that means interest for Ravenloft, and then a *true* Campaign Setting book will be eventually released.

I sure hope that is the case - I would hate to see all those amazing campaign settings devolve into little more than a spin-off adventure shoehorned in the Realms.

Dark Sun for 5th, Wizards of the Coast ... that's what I'm waiting for. Granted, never gave you my money in the 4th Edition reboot (which I do not regret, that edition sucked balls, imo), but I *love* 5th Edition and would love to see the Settings re-emerge in this edition, even in a less imposing presence as they did in AD&D.
 

unnatural 20

Explorer
But the setting is still crap & it's rules worse. (No, I'm not a fan of the setting. It ranks #3 on my D&D dislikes list)
<snip>

Do you really have a list of your most hated D&D products lying around somewhere, to reference while posting?

Strahd,

I liked your novel, I liked your boardgame, I liked returning to your castle twice, and I even liked your old-ass PC game. I look forward to dancing one more time.

Edit: I really, really tried to like your street fightin' game. I just couldn't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:





CapnZapp

Legend
Its not a clear cut issue and recalls some of the recent video game controversy over leaks and reporting.

If WotC isn't saying something, then reporting is fine. Get the information out.
But they were going to say something. They have an announcement. It doesn't hurt to let them have their reveal, to work with the company rather than scoop them.
Nothing is really gained by getting this out two days early. Even if other people are posting it on the forums, putting it on the front page legitimizes the leak. Someone was working at the revelation. Their hard work is now partially wasted. The incentive to check out the Geek & Sundry interview is less pressing, which hurts that site.

This is information obtained by accidentally released information on a website. Draft articles partially posted. That's not great.
Would it be equally valid if someone got it from a lost folder or tablet? How about someone breaking an NDA (or their friend)?

We don't have a right to know. This isn't a Snowden thing. Our rights or privacy isn't being violated. WotC should be allowed to announce products on their own schedule.
You really come across as painfully naive. "It doesn't hurt to let them"... Really?

What says this isn't EXACTLY the kind of planned leak the PR geniuses at WotC have come up with to incite excitement and buzz?

If WotC wanted to keep a lid on this they would have to work harder on... actually keeping the lid on this.

There's no such thing as "accidentally released" corporate information. They release it, they live with that decision. Regardless. End of story.

Your comparison to Snowden is completely inappropriate. I mean COMPLETELY wrong.

Your reference to some kind of video game controversy reeks of FUD. What are you specifically referring to?

Putting stuff on the front page doesn't "legitimize" anything.

Just... stop, Jester Canuck. You're way wrong here. Just let a completely harmless leak about a completely inoffensive toy product happen. Let it go. Really.
 

CapnZapp

Legend
Hmmm ...

I think ... maybe this is WotC's way of seeing if there is 'buying interest' for a new campaign setting? Releasing an adventure which temporarily teleports PCs from the Forgotten Realms to Ravenloft for *just* one adventure. If few people buy it, that's okay, it was one adventure and it will never happen again. But if many people buy it, that means interest for Ravenloft, and then a *true* Campaign Setting book will be eventually released.
I think it is overwhelmingly likely that this book will BE the campaign info you will get for the foreseeable future.

All their "adventures" are not just adventures; they're part campaign material too.

No reason to think otherwise this time. After all, they hope everybody interested in "gothic" support for D&D will buy this, even if they aren't particularly interested in the specific Strahd adventure.

Besides. Isn't Ravenloft the archtypical "just one adventure" setting?
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top