He's an opinionated bald man, why can't we slam him?
Probably good news. They certainly need the help.
Probably good news. They certainly need the help.
I've never before seen a contract where the duration was "until jury duty ends"...
Those articles are very old, and I hope that he's seen the error of his ways, before trying to bring such out-dated philosophy to 5E.As well as the disavowal of absolutes. Like the absolute ability to completely negate any chance of an AoO when a swashbuckler runs around attacking 3 things a round. They could have done so much better, like say such attacks are at disadvantage, or he has resistance against such attacks. Literally pertinent in so many ways to the latest AU article they just published yesterday.
Those articles are very old, and I hope that he's seen the error of his ways, before trying to bring such out-dated philosophy to 5E.
Gone are the days of Pathfinder or 4E, with their worthless Knock spells that can't even do the one thing the spells are specifically designed to do. Long live 5E, with its spells that just work, within the bounds that adventurers actually operate, with the adjudication of deities and solar phenomena being left to DM discretion.
Of course. It's just that more codified rulesets rely more heavily on their codified rules, so there's no need for the DM to adjudicate.5e didn't give back DM discretion because it never left in the first place.
Actually he was calling on people to buy Silver Marches to show the bean counters at WotC that people really did buy books for lore, so as to combat the bean counter's position that Realms sourcebooks needed more crunchy rules at the expense of fluff, because the bean counters believed people bought books for crunch alone.
They did not go overboard with the fluff/lore content in Silver Marches.
I'm not sure who wanted him gone from Paizo