Someone needs to stat out a Feyote.
I think the answer to that is yes.Owlbear isn't a silly name. Given the nature of the monster, that's the only thing it could be called. Now, whether it's a silly monster or not...
They'd probably just call them snacks.It occurs to me...this is a bit humanoidcentric. What if other intelligent species used this naming convention?
To a dragon, a dwarf paladin might be a Holyblade Buttertasty Crunchydumpling.
Would calling it a strongclaw owlbear make it sound cooler or more evocative?
This gets back to what I don't understand - equating all compound names as equally good/bad.
Sure, Strongclaw Owlbear sounds silly to me. Feymire Crocodile sounds awesome. Just like everyone in my group loves saying Babau! but couldn't remember the names for Barbed Devils or Ice Devils if their lives depended on it. Or find Ixitxachitl completely unpronounceable.
That's a product of them having different types of each monster, each with its own name. My point in all this is that in the vast majority of cases, the adjectives used to differentiate monsters of the same species are not CompoundWord adjectives, they are simply descriptive terms.So no wonder 4e is being called the compoundword monster edition. You've shown me it is.