Istbor
Dances with Gnolls
So I was watching some episodes of StarTalk on NEtflix this weekend.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson interviewed George Takei.
The topic of Fermi's paradox, getting to other stars, even the suitability of humanity for being worthy of getting out there came up.
Here's what I heard:
a) Tyson is a really smart dude
b) he's an optimist
c) he thinks we can come up with the ideas/energy/matter we'll need eventually to get to another planet
d) we as a species are a culmination of all of our evolution and traits that got us this far, which is farther than any other species (we have rockets and art, beavers just have dams). We'd still be eating bananas and humping each other like those peace loving bonobos (or whatever they're called) if we weren't wired to strive for more.
e) any other species that might get as far, likely has gone through just as much
f) that means we are worthy to reach the stars. Not because of some papal blessing, but because we are intrinsically not unworthy. We are more than just our wars. And if you look, just as much, if not more technological innovation is driven outside of war, rather than by war.
I don't know. Looking at the internet, the pool of Humanity's collective knowledge and experiences. I feel we are still just eating banana's and humping each other.
However, I agree, there likely isn't a 'worth' factor involved. Perhaps a more, let's leave them to their own devices and see what happens. I mean, we already do that with ourselves.
I certainly think there is something out there. The universe is just too big and too many chances for a happy accident not to occur again. But it is big. And we are not very close to overcoming that hurdle yet. Sadly, we aren't even remotely trying. I believe we have great potential for overcoming obstacles when we want or need to. We just require that catalyst.
And perhaps, that is what someone out there is waiting for. To see if we actually want it badly enough. Otherwise, why not leave the monkey-men to play in their sandbox?