I'm concerned about the relative lack of playtesting. IIRC, 3.0 had *tons* of playtesters, and they weren't all just in-house.
I'm convinced that 4E is going to be published prematurely (i.e. not sufficiently playtested), and within 2 or 3 years, they'll be forced to do a revision. I'll wait for that inevitable revision before buying anything. In the meantime, I have about three 3.x adventure paths sitting on my shelf waiting to be run.
You know, Monte Cook's decision to retire from gaming is starting to make more and more sense...
I'm convinced that 4E is going to be published prematurely (i.e. not sufficiently playtested), and within 2 or 3 years, they'll be forced to do a revision. I'll wait for that inevitable revision before buying anything. In the meantime, I have about three 3.x adventure paths sitting on my shelf waiting to be run.
You know, Monte Cook's decision to retire from gaming is starting to make more and more sense...