Banshee16 said:Something that bugs me a little is the talk of launching a new class, the Swordmage. A big complaint against 3E that was used to justify 4E is the rules bloat, and lack of balance in later materials. And here we're talking about adding a new core class less than 6 months after the launch of the new edition.......
I just dislike the fact that its buried in the...muck... that is the new FR book, along with new powers for other classes. I'm going to sit down with that section of the book, flip through it for ideas, then toss it back on the shelves, because I'm not going to shell out $30 just for that, even though that seems to be the point- put general stuff in the campaign book so the general audience is more likely to buy it.
Though, just to make it worse, 3 months, not 6. June-->September.
Doubtful, WotC splats have never been good about that, though they were talking about the swordmage back in november or december.If the class was that far along in development, shouldn't it be in the core? Seems like we're just setting off down the exact same path as before, but this time, it's planned from the beginning. Do added classes get nearly as much playtesting as a core rules release?
Banshee
But yes, this is planned. There was the slashdot(?) interview a few months back- they expect 4e to last 8-10 years. Then 5e!