Well, I never whined for any of those things... ;(
But, I'm particularly concerned about 'less errata.' I want exactly as much errata as it takes to fix problems with published material. If something's broken or nonsensical or worthless, I don't want it to stay that way because they're "trying to avoid too much errata."
I will agree with this. I'm fine if they want to up their QA so they need to produce less errata, but I don't want errata to be left behind.
I agree with teh general community that there is a lot of errata, but I would much rather have it than not for my group. At worst case I ignore it, and I'm in no worse shape than before.
Or I use it if I think it helps my game.