My apologies for taking a while to get to addressing Ruthia's concerns in the post, as you can probably imagine this issue has put a notable workload on my plate and I've been shifting through it as efficiently as I know how to.
There is a thread
recently posted specifically for requesting clarification of CoC issues, so far I've skimmed it and can find no questions about what is a familiar or what are the rules on nudity.
If you don't request clarification on these issues we can't clarify them. If you request them privately we'll clarify privately, if you request publicly we'll clarify publicly.
If you are being harassed and you're unhappy with the way the magi who dealt with it then you can email me, email Siani or email us both. (That matter is covered at the start of the thread).
It's almost impossible to become a Magi, quite easy to volunteer for the fire department.
Volunteers for the fire department receive screening just like Magi applicants do. Do to impracticality we don't require applicants to pass extreme fitness tests or legal background checks. Like the fire department we only take applicants when we have a space for them and the time and resources to train them.
It seems more like a volunteering council that decides things together, which isn't a bad method. Don't take this the wrong way, I'm not trying to insult the Magi's or anything, but they do seem to be a unit that is very hard to become one of. If you noticed, they wanted more Magi's and not a new one has really popped up.
It
is hard to become a Magi (though easy to apply to be one) for very good reasons.
Firstly, as part of their job all Magi have access to moderately sensitive information such as chat logs, IP addresses and the personal contact details of every other Magi. You wouldn't want us giving out this information to the general public, so we have to be careful who we let see it as a Magi.
Secondly, they have special chat and forum powers that come (as all power should) with special responsibilities. That means we have to be sure anyone we make a Magi will not use these powers improperly or for personal reasons. You don't want a rogue Magi to ban all your friends because they said something hurtful to that magi out of uniform, so we have to screen carefully for that.
Thirdly, we have standards to maintain. If every Magi you talk to is lucid, well spoken and follows procedures in place to ensure people get treated fairly then you will by default assume anyone labelled Magi is going to do so. If we were to allow almost anyone to become a Magi then we would lose the expectations associated with the position and the respect attached too.
Forthly, the more people who are involved the longer it takes to reach a decision. You would have seen this at Wizards where each major decision had to be passed up each level of the chain and discussed by a committee before getting approval to move up a level until final approval. We proposed the The Meeting Place and finalized the specifications, it took two years for the room to go live.
With a single Setting Co-Ordinator in charge, it took about six weeks to work out the specifications for the Bazaar and then two weeks for the Cage to go live when that additional was proposed.
More people also means more possibility for individual interpretations of rules which creates more confusion, more chaos and more people wanting to be moderators so they can "set things right".
Lastly, we can only have so many Magi because there's only so many patrons about, if the site doubled in size next week we'd look for more Magi then. But as it is we can't really put out too many more Magi without the moderator to patron ratio getting to the point where people feel they're more like a nobility class than a group of people there to help.
We deliberately try to keep the place open to players and make them feel that it's their playground, that feel is hard to maintain when say a third of the the room is known to be moderator who could be watching you and reporting back to The Man.