Science Fiction vs. Science Fantasy

Nellisir

Hero
It's not that fantasy doesn't examine philosophical ideas. You're right, that's not true. But, fantasy most often is examining moral issues, rather than ethical ones. Fantasy is far more concerned with good and evil, rather than right and wrong. That's a whole lot reductionist, but, at the core, I do think that is the basic differentiation.

So what would this be?
[these] works are infused with psychological undertones involving an exploration of the darker side of the protagonist... whilst preserving strong humanist ideals. The contextual richness of the... varied [setting], races, cultures and history enables all [of the books] to explore and expand upon an increasingly diverse and storied environment.

What changes if you replace [setting] with "planets" versus "kingdoms"?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Hussar

Legend
So what would this be?


What changes if you replace [setting] with "planets" versus "kingdoms"?

Nothing. You can certainly have all the tropes of SF and still have a fantasy story. That's what Star Wars is. Examining the darker side rather literally. :D

For me, setting has very little to do with the difference between SF and Fantasy. The Quest for Fire is SF despite being set with cavemen discovering fire. Anne McCaffery's Pern series is pretty much stock fantasy, despite using a number of SF tropes.

I guess that's where I'd define Science Fantasy. A fantasy story that uses SF tropes.
 

Nellisir

Hero
Nothing. You can certainly have all the tropes of SF and still have a fantasy story. That's what Star Wars is. Examining the darker side rather literally. :D

That quote wasn't from/about Star Wars. Totally different series, and one that (as I recall) delves into right and wrong, not good and evil. Which you posited as the difference between scientific fiction and fantastic fiction.
 


Fantasy is only limited by the ambition of its authors. I think the genre is perfectly positioned to tackle moral and ethical issues.

I'd say the Pern series fits under Science Fiction, as would the first couple of Pendergast novels. Michael Moorcock has written quite a few novels that fit under Science Fantasy, including:

The Eternal Champion: The Eldren armies feature warriors called halflings. These halflings have the ability to teleport themselves by rearranging their atomic composition. Furthermore, the Eldren weaponry that Humanity refer to as "sorcery" are futuristic tanks, guns, and bombs.

The first Corum trilogy: Corum's race possess technology which allowed them to build a castle that travels between the planes and spheres of the Multiverse.

The City in the Autumn Stars: Libussa, the Duchess of Crete, constructs a human-sized crucible for use in an alchemic ritual. After her sacrificial death on a black cross during the Conjunction of the Spheres, she was reborn and intended to use the crucible and the Holy Grail to merge her being with von Bek. The result--a hermaphrodite--would be the ruler in the Age of Reason.

The Hawkmoon/Count Brass series: In the first four Hawkmoon books, Dorian Hawkmoon encounters a people with a device that can shift beings from one dimension to another. The Empire of Granbretan possess scientific knowledge which allowed them to create a mechanical throne-globe to sustain their King-Emperor Huon. Granbretan's armies are equipped with flamelances and ornithopters. The chief sorcerer of Granbretan helped construct the Empire's firepower and built a time-traveling device.

Jerry Cornelius: In the first novel, the character Miss Brunner has the tendency to absorb people. Brunner also spearheads a project to gather the world's brightest minds to construct a Messiah to the Age of Science. In the second novel, Jerry shifts through the Multiverse for a bit. In the third novel, there's a secretive gathering attended by many characters from Moorcock's work, including Elric, Erekose, and Hawkmoon. Plus lots of alternate history stuff, including a transmog machine Jerry uses in the second novel to turn people into whatever they desire. The main plot of the second novel also involves a box that increases the amount of entropy within the universe.

Science fantasy uses the trappings of science fiction--the technology, the alien races--and uses them as vehicles of character development. This is in contrast to science fiction, which can get caught up on "worldbuilding" with the futuristic technology etc at the expense of the story's characters. Of course, some science fantasy may also bring in more fantastic elements and use some real-world science to ground them or create a system for those elements.

On the subject of planets vs kingdoms, why not both?

If you're writing with the fantasy staples--elves, goblins, or whatever--study the folklore. There's many variations of elves and goblins in real world mythology. Thus, you could have an elf planet populated by the different kinds of elves from the various real-world cultures, a goblin planet populated by the redcaps, kobolds, and other different types of goblins from real-world cultures.
 
Last edited:

Hand of Evil

Hero
Epic
In the beginning there was pulp, it was fiction but it covered a great number of subjects; action, adventure, magic, horror, alternate worlds, death-rays, the occult, and stuff like that.

Then came the Atomic Bomb and the age of the atom and pulp had to be explained within the laws of nature or rationally, things like FTL "warps" space are explained. What this did was break apart pulp into science stuff and the rest went to fantasy (the stuff that did not have science in it).

The Star Wars effect: Star Wars was sort of a reunion for science fiction and fantasy, the science did not have to be explained, it was just in the background and then you added your elements of fantasy. From this we find ourselves back at pulp, lots of stuff mixed in with science and rationality taking a background role.

So, don't think of it as science fiction or science fantasy, think of it as pulp.
 

When I hear "pulp", I think of stories where the setting is crafted on the spot as the author is writing the story. I have nothing against those stories; I love the Conan and Elric series. I think you can have a science-fantasy setting that transcends "pulp" by combining the snappy style of pulp stories with good worldbuilding.
 

Remove ads

Top