Why the beer hate? (Forked Thread: What are the no-goes...)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chainsaw

Banned
Banned
If someone did ruin my game while drinking, I'd consider them to be the problem, not the alcohol. Even if they were obviously drunk enough to make a human petrol bomb. I would kick him out of my house, not the booze.

Ditto.

For the record, though I'd probably not join a group that had a ban on drinking, I rarely (if ever) actually drink while playing. Go figure.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

malraux

First Post
TEthyl alcohol is defined as a toxin, meaning it is poisonous to the body. Water, while it might kill you in large doses (i.e. drowning, etc), is not in and of itself poisonous to the body.

Water is toxic. Water toxicity - definition of Water toxicity in the Medical dictionary - by the Free Online Medical Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia. It is poisonous to the body. Caffeine is toxic. Hell, oxygen is pretty toxic, which is why anti-oxidants are good. But it's all dose dependent. A single beer is not toxic, no more than a glass of water or breath of air.
 

Charwoman Gene said:
Drinking alone is a sign of alcoholism.

In some cultures, people believe this. I have no idea if it's accurate, especially given the source - the Aquarium, written by an (alleged) ex-spy for the Russians who (apart from the spy stuff) writes a lot of "crakpot" theories. In the book, he said his boss drank in front of a mirror, because he believed the expression.

Malraux said:
A single beer is not toxic, no more than a glass of water or breath of air.

Um... what? I find it hard to believe that a glass of beer is "exactly as toxic" as a glass of water.
 

malraux

First Post
Um... what? I find it hard to believe that a glass of beer is "exactly as toxic" as a glass of water.

As little as a half-gallon of water (two quarts) in a single setting has the potential of killing you.
All Ears: Hold Your Wee for a Wii - Water Intoxication Death

Ironically, beer would be less dangerous because it has various things dissolved in it. And 2 quarts, while certainly pushing one well past the legal limit, would not be a lethal amount.
 

Jeff Wilder

First Post
Thanks for the answer, Lord Mhoram. It makes sense if your objection is religiously based.
What if his religion forbade the use of religious iconography, including such things as demons and devils, or forbade pretending to cast spells? Would it be reasonable for him to expect gamers to forbear?
 


Visit New Jersey. :D

I live in Toronto. We argue Lake Ontario should be shown as brown rather than blue on maps because it would more accurately show its color.

All Ears: Hold Your Wee for a Wii - Water Intoxication Death

Ironically, beer would be less dangerous because it has various things dissolved in it. And 2 quarts, while certainly pushing one well past the legal limit, would not be a lethal amount.

Be that as it may, when people are talking about the effects of alcohol in this thread, I believe they're talking about mental effects :)
 

Bumbles

First Post
What if his religion forbade the use of religious iconography, including such things as demons and devils, or forbade pretending to cast spells? Would it be reasonable for him to expect gamers to forbear?

I certainly would be willing to accept a GM who ran a game without those things, they might well have a good game. I have even run such a game myself, though the reasons were realism rather than religious.

If somebody chooses not to play in my games that do feature those things, I can accept that easily.
 

Jeff Wilder

First Post
I certainly would be willing to accept a GM who ran a game without those things, they might well have a good game. I have even run such a game myself, though the reasons were realism rather than religious.

If somebody chooses not to play in my games that do feature those things, I can accept that easily.
None of which answers what I actually asked.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top