D&D 5E Things that probably won't happen, but man would it be cool if they did!

Boarstorm

First Post
Now these - 5e versions of Dragon Mountain and Undermountain - would both rock. And they could easily be made setting-neutral...

Lanefan

Heh, I should hope so -- at least on the Dragon Mountain front, considering that the whole premise of the adventure was a plane-hopping (and therefore setting-neutral) mountain.

Undermountain, of course, has some pretty strong ties to FR and Waterdeep, but it wouldn't be too hard to file off the edges.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

As far as I know, they did exactly this for (most of?) the last year of the magazines. Or is that not what you meant?

It is likely that you are correct. I didn't switch over to 4E (but will switch to 5E) so, after about a year or so of the articles not being compiled into PDF magazines I simply stopped following along to see if they'd kept their promise.
 


Echohawk

Shirokinukatsukami fan
It is likely that you are correct. I didn't switch over to 4E (but will switch to 5E) so, after about a year or so of the articles not being compiled into PDF magazines I simply stopped following along to see if they'd kept their promise.
GX.Sigma is indeed correct. From January 2010 through to September 2012, only individual articles were released, but from October 2012 they began releasing compiled PDFs again. Dragon 395-415 and Dungeon 186-206 are the issues without compiled versions. My D&D PDF Collector's Guide contains links to the compiled issues (where they exist) or the individual articles (where that's all there is) for anyone wanting to systematically download all of the DDI magazine content.
 




Echohawk

Shirokinukatsukami fan
72) all the monsters from all the settings from every edition, updated to 5e and publicated in a single HUGE volume.
My best guess is that there are a bit more than 9,000 D&D creatures, depending on how you count them but equating to roughly that many stat blocks.

Assuming you settle for four monsters on a page, which would be pretty cramped, you'd need a book with 2,250 pages to cover everything. The widest monster book on my shelf at the moments appears to be The Tome of Horrors Complete, which is 5cm wide, and has 800 pages.

At four monsters per page, you're looking at a book 15cm (6 inches) thick. If you wanted to dedicate a full page to each creature, your book would be about 60cm (24 inches) thick. That's roughly twice the width of The Complete Miss Marple, which, as far as I can tell, is currently the world's thickest book.

If they did make such a book, I'd probably buy one.
 

wwanno

First Post
At four monsters per page, you're looking at a book 15cm (6 inches) thick. If you wanted to dedicate a full page to each creature, your book would be about 60cm (24 inches) thick. That's roughly twice the width of The Complete Miss Marple, which, as far as I can tell, is currently the world's thickest book.

If they did make such a book, I'd probably buy one.

I want it. I would buy it. And I don't mean "I want it in a single tome".
I see it as a tool to play old 1-2-3-4e adventures.
1)The only important things would be:
- Every single monster ever created.
- creatures ordered by name.
2) some nice add-on would be
- Appendix with index of past adventures listing all creatures appearing in each one
- maybe collector binder format (I don't know if I explained myself well - sorry for my English - I mean like the one of 2e, where you could add "sheets" with new monsters)



I hate when I can't figure where monsters are (mm1 or fiend folio? No wait, it was in the eberron monster manual! Or it was some adventure appendix? Nevermind I will create my version of this creature)
 

You know what I want most?

A new D&D setting that blows my mind and gets me excited about running it.

It doesn't have to be "classic D&D" or "include all the monsters", just suitable for use with the bulk of D&D's rules, classes, races - if some or even many are excluded, that's fine!

I don't really care about any of the specifics, in fact, other than that it blows my mind and makes me really excited about running it - the thing about most of the settings I've been most impressed with and found most usable is that, actually, I hadn't thought of that beforehand.

The only thing tying together settings that made me go "Whoa, I want to run that!" is that virtually all of them were created by people with real vision, and knowledge of stuff like philosophy, world history outside of the Classical Era and the Middle Ages/Renaissance and mysticism, not just classic SF & Fantasy novels or the like, so I mean, that's something that's likely to be associated with anything that awesome.

I think it's really unlikely we'll see such a thing, because it would be inherently very risky to do right - requiring significant amounts of high-quality art, maps, full-colour and so on, and anything which has an opinion or an attitude or a point-of-view will piss some people off* (and my mind has never been blown by something that didn't), limiting the audience (really, though, I think not having that also limits the audience, because people don't get excited or interested as much).

Eberron wasn't far off, I note - a very high-quality setting and something of a point-of-view with it's "pulp" deal, but it ended up feeling a little designed-by-committee (even though it totally wasn't) and shorn of sharp corners for reasons I can't quite place. And that's my major fear here - that if we do get a new, exciting-seeming setting, it'll play it a little too safe, too conservative (not politically), too "normal", because WotC want to hit the broadest possible audience.

* = Absolutely goes for me too - some OSR stuff has a real, consistent, point-of-view that I don't vibe with, but I respect the hell out of it because it has an actual position, an actual style, an actual approach (LotFP, for example - I don't want to run or play that, despite owning some of it, but I like that it knows what it wants and how it wants to present it's world and so on).
 

Remove ads

Top