Getting back to some questions you had that I never had time for...
I'm saying that if you believe that making and distributing Christian films are signs of Christian influence in the US, than it should apply to Muslim films too. Shouldn't your logic apply to all?
The only reason I brought up Christian movies within the US, is to reflect that, from my perspective, Christianity does not seem to have the level of influence within US as sometimes people on the net like to insinuate.
Yes, I know, but when I say that you're lumping Islam into one homogenous body, it is because you present things as if Islam, thus Muslims, thinks the same about apostacy. If you agree there are many Islams, why talk as if their is one view of apostacy? I'm willing to bet that the standard for apostacy you use is Saudi Arabia. Certainly not Albania, because if Albania was used, apostacy wouldn't be a problem for Islam, right?
I specifically never mentioned details re the apostacy. My original post only mentions that Islam has a different view to apostacy compared to other faiths.
And yet you critic me for critiquing you, right after you say critiquing the Muslim world is your personal mission. Double standards, as you put yourself above critics while critic others.
We have somehow covered this, but just to clarify - I mentioned a number of factors in which I (personal opinion) find Islamophobia justifiable. Critiquing the Muslim world is not my personal mission, however correcting a white-washing of history is. Just like I have challenged or critiqued Christianity, I so do with other religions - we just happened to land on Islam in these last few pages.
But you had to make the debate about something else, cause it is very important for you that we should fear Muslims or that they are bad
Europe has come along way having battled sexism, gender preference, strict religiosity, limitation on freedom/speech, communism...etc - so when large masses of immigrants flood into their countries with a different culture, mindset and ideology it is only natural for a people to develop a fear or mistrust against them. You further need to appreciate that these are homelands of cultures and heritages - and there is a real sense to defend that. It isn't the salad-societies of South Africa, USA, Canada and Australia.
so out of nowhere comes apostacy.
It is not, in my view, out of nowhere. You must respect freedom of choice/thought. Liberation of the mind. The line Islam takes on apostacy reflects against that. Secret apostastes, I imagine, are very much like closet gays - fearing the shame, judgement and perhaps disownment by their families/communities.
This is why I ask cute women to play with my organ.
That right there is discrimination.
So, Al Qaeda is now an organisation that is trying to colonize Europe?
No, I'm not an intelligence gathering agency is what I was getting at. Although that statement does sound bad.
Not looking good for the organized colonization of Europe by Muslims.
According to Shadowcon, it is suspected that muslims posses the ability to easily impregnate their female partners and thereby initiate human multiplication on a level superior to that of Atheists and Christians of Europe. It is this method, according to a top Shadow official that Europe will be subsumed into the Greater Caliphate. It is certainly an evolved approach, much like the evolution of conquering countries through finance as opposed to military might.
So, your basing your statement on what you feel, fear in this instance, but not facts?
Well it is a fact less Greeks and Italians are emigrating to Africa & the Middle East as opposed to the Middle Easterners and Africans emigrating to Greece and Italy.
That would mean all European governments, as the word "entire" would lead us to believe
Entire European Governments does not necessarily equal the EU. In my mind it is synonymous with entire European Countries, which certainly does not equal the EU.
But that doesn't mean it is a rational policy.
Why? Do you personally not believe that culture, heritage and a certain way/style of life is worth defending?
"Might". So, it doesn't mean it is happening or will. It is the fear of a possibility, of a slippery slope. Not something that is rational or factual. It is base on islamophobia.
Prevention is better than a cure. Human nature.
I would disagree, based on my example to which you responded. The reasons for the persecution of Jews, in Medieval Europe, were also based in religion and yet we do not refer to that as Christian. That's basic inequity of reporting. It's not done because that's essentially the majority of us and we don't want to recognize, nor apologize for, the actions of our fore-bearers. Such a simple admission. So hard to make.
For starters the inquisitions are collectively called the Christian Inquisitions and at the time it was supported by many of the higher Church hierarchy. We will have to disagree on this issue.