CapnZapp
Legend
My point is that not liking a spell is fine. Just don't attack the language as being unclear just because it doesn't do what you want it to do.
That is: if you think the spell is underpowered, say it is underpowered, not that it is unclear.
By the written text, it only applies to a single attack, and yes, that can be an enemy "stealing" it.
But not only is that cheesy as hell, it makes no sense.
In fact, the spell is crystal clear. There is no way to interpret it as giving more than a single attack, making it True Strike for allies.
If the devs have gone on record saying the spell will receive errata that's one thing. It still does not make the current wording unclear.
That is: if you think the spell is underpowered, say it is underpowered, not that it is unclear.
By the written text, it only applies to a single attack, and yes, that can be an enemy "stealing" it.
But not only is that cheesy as hell, it makes no sense.
In fact, the spell is crystal clear. There is no way to interpret it as giving more than a single attack, making it True Strike for allies.
If the devs have gone on record saying the spell will receive errata that's one thing. It still does not make the current wording unclear.