Search results

I was Suniel's player, but no worries, do what you feel is best because that is what is important. I would describe more about Suniel's past but probably not all that important, better to keep an air of mystery. Just lots of horrific things done by and done to him, we did leave a lot ambigous...

Nice! That's pretty sweet Steel. Impressive work you have come up with, and looks great with pencil sketching. It is greatly appreciated that you take such time to do this work. I feel likes it's not my place to give suggestions to an artist, for you have created something wonderful indeed, but...

Earmark this page, here begins the slide, the dimplomacy roll of ready, fire, aim. This journy down the river was crazy. Being blinded sucked. :p

double post.

Perhaps maybe do a few playthrough with all rules being literal. I guess only after collecting enough emperical evidence should I really make an issue for or against this C/C stealth issue. I think really a DM will decide how much any given area will have Cover and Concealment. If your allies...

Exactly, and thanks for the clearing up that other d6 earlier.

Correct you lose CA if you attack, and you have to make an action after to regain stealth, when you have C/C. Please read post 55, official WotC made that same statement, you are seen after you attack and lose your CA. But if you are in Cover/Conceal you can make a move action stealthly to...

Because I will type this word for word on page 280 "Creatures and Cover: When you make a ranged attack against an enemy and other enemies are in the way, your target has cover. Your allies never grant cover to your enemies, and neither allies nor enemies give cover against melee, close, or area...

I am confused, where does that extra d6 come from? The only goblin I see that gains the d6 bonus damage is the Goblin Blackblade and the Sharpshooter. I didn't see any other of the Goblin subtypes with it. So thats more a class specfic bonus d6 then a racial d6, could you clearify how a Gobby...

I agree 100%. My point is that a rogue can't use any form of cover that may or may not appear from allies and ranged attacks. I was pointing out how it doesn't work and shouldn't be a concern for stealth checks. The cover from allies is perhaps only a mechanic used to represent how hard it is to...

The only difference between invis and stealth is that you DON'T need Cover or Concealment to be invis and stealth-hidden you do. Even the rules on Invis say you have to make a stealth check. Stealth vs Perception isn't just seeing someone, its hearing, noticing footprints, blades of grass...

You can't hide behind your allies. You gain cover from ONLY ranged attacks at you. And you can't make a hide check on the enemies turn while he is attacking the rogue. Once the attack ends, you no longer have cover against only that ranged attack, and no cover means no stealth. On the rogues...

Pg. 280 "Creatures and Cover:" Second sentence reads "Your Allies never grant cover to your enemies, and neither allies nor enemies give cover against melee, close, or area attacks." Pg 281 the "Cover against an Area Attack" show the Bugbears gaining no Cover from their allies, but the Goblin...

Ahh yes, thanks you are correct, it states which of the defenders does have cover. But it's Ranged attack only as the rule says. This Diagram is showing a ranged attack to either a troll or a Bugbear. So it means the reverse it true, on the same diagram if the Bugbear were to make a ranged...

Thanks Xorn, I appreciate you posting that in it entire original form, minus the name change to avoid furture potential beatings :melee: This allows everyone to make their own reading on it and not that of a paraphrase. so again thank you.

Page 280. The graphic labeled Cover. The attacker has line of effects to the troll and cover to the troll because of the Goblin in front of the troll. He aslo has line of effect to the bugbear while and ally is between them, but it clearly states "No Cover" in large green white letters. Now it...

Off Hander Not sure, but I think on pg 217 where it describes weapon properties, the Off-Hand property says something about an off-hand weapon is light enough that you can hold it in your off-hand and still attack effectively while holding a weapon in your main hand. Also on pg 215, the last...

New Game I think the biggest thing one has to realize is that its a new game. Sad there are no druids for me, but since this is a new game it means there are not going to be conversions. Unlike 3e to 3.5e, where it used the same basic game, just reworded stuff, 4e is a new creature entirely...

interesting, Wow Sanz, you really are 'reading' into this more then you need to. I think most everyone on here is posting what they feel is right, like your post just now, I am sure you feel you are right in thinking i am 'dripping' with whatever term you feel like labeling me with. And I am...

... Sorry you think that. Statings facts that are easily referenced this entire post. Like when some people make personal comments about stuff versus when people quote others and reference material readily availible for all. I feel no remorse in pointing out the difference, I think it's clear...