Jack99
Adventurer
Derren said:This definition comes directly from the Fire Archon preview article.
Yes, so you are saying that flame = living flame?
Technically a flame can't really be dead, so I guess a flame would have to be living. So unless you are saying that a fire archon is nothing but an ordinary flame, I am guessing that somehow you are saying something else..
What?
No really...
WHAT?
While I don't recall the wording of said article, I am pretty sure that a living flame /= a flame.