OK. Now that I've gotten most of Archer's prelude up we're in a position to talk more about humanity and xp.
Here's really how I see it, the Vampire book requires "heinous acts" to have been committed in order to swap out humanity for xp. This is an optional rule (again per the vampire book).
As I've mentioned before I don't personally love the rule because it tends to swing the character balance toward people playing psychopaths, etc. A stereotypical "serial killer" character already starts out with certain advantages (they're more likely to have "useful" rpg skills like combat, sneaking, etc). giving them an extra helping of xp doesn't, to my mind, really help the game.
Festy's character was a peculiar mixture for me in that,
1. He didn't have his character actually doing anything particularly bad
2. Most of the stuff he was buying wasn't particularly unbalancing (an encyclopedic knowledge of guns, speaking Mandarin and Arabic, etc. etc); his highest combat skill is a ** (*** really with pistols but he still has 5 dice)
3. Because he'd indicated he wanted to be embraced into the Invictus it gave me a chance to reveal a little bit more about how I see them in the city.
3 was useful to me because the Invictus dominate the city (as we'll probably see in the next post) and I wanted to do some "showing" about how they see the world. (Blood bonds to enforce control are normal, Neonates are property, etc)
So I felt that, while I'd "asked" people not to do the humanity trade in, I hadn't required it precisely, and I felt like Festy had tried to follow the spirit of the request (his character wasn't a high powered psychopath). He's a strong investigator but that's useful for me as a storyteller, and to "effect change" in the world he'd need to go to other player characters (maybe, we'll see of course).
Which got me back to "heinous acts".
Archer's background didn't include any. (To my mind, in a game where characters who hunt things-that-look-like-people-with-a-sword and sold-weapons-to-the-nazis are starting off with Humanity 7 we're talking about some fairly heinous stuff).
In retrospect I should almost certainly have confired with him more but I ultimately just went with my gut and tried to work out something fulfilled the necessary requirements so that we could get started. (I wouldhave found out, for instance, that he wasn't particularly interested in being embraced into the invictus, it was just a reference added for verisimilitude).
But that's life.
The result was some unpleasantness in Archers prelude. (To my mind he lost the first dot around
here[/url ] and the second around [url=http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=3960173&postcount=60]here.)
So I said people would get a chance to talk, unfettered. I appreciate everyone waiting and holding back.
Please, tell me what you feel/think etc. Posts and/or email would be fine.