Cult of Arrhim

Someone

Adventurer
The cult of Arrhim is a philosophy which affirms that the natural state of any society, and the only cure against lawlessness and chaos is the absolute rule of the strong.

Arrhim himself is not a god, but the allegedly starter of the cult. He´s a mysterious, messianic leader that supposedly rules over a huge fortress located in a hidden valley among the mountains, in an unknow location. The wildest rumors run about him, some of them saying he´s actually a devil -perhaps even the unspeakable horror of a pit fiend- that found his way to the material plane. Many say that Arrhim is actively seeking godhood through the spreading of his cult.

Arrhim´s philosophy is contained in the Tractatus of Peace, a book of surprising logical and literary deepness that has seen much spreading in the recent times. Even through the argument contained in it is abhorrent to most, few deny the subtle work and twisted, yet paradoxically simple argument it contains. This magnificent work has lead many to the idea that the author is some sort of supernatural, lawful evil being; in any case, he´s a genius.

The tractatus affirms that it´s a cosmic truth that the strong must rule: anything other than that creates an imbalance, an unstability that will be filled or mended sooner or later, creating a period of turbulence and chaos. Translated to social terms, the rule of the weak is inherently unstable, since it creates greater opportunities for others to usurp power, and less opportunities to resist and keep the current order. Once the stronger is the one ruler, by definition there will be no more challenges for him: the events will have reached his most stable position, and further disorder will be impossible.

The stronger the dominion, the biggest the difference in power from the ruler to those under him, the stability reached will be greater. Therefore, a ruler that want to apply the universal, meta-divine principle of order to his dominion must aspire to nothing less than absolute and unquestioned obedience. Also, it´s a self evident truth that power over other sentient being is clearly demonstrated when he´s put to suffering; thus, one of the signs of successful rulership is the lack of humanity when dealing with those greatly inferior and weak; the Tractatus however states clarifies that this desirable state must be reached with time, because causing too much suffering to underlings when the difference in power isn´t great enough can lead to the ruler´s destruction and therefore chaos.

As a consequence of the universal right of the stronger to rule, it follows that nothing prevails over them; they are not, by definition, bound by further ethic or moral constrain, unless imposed by someone stronger, in which case the main, cosmic rule is not violated.

In the context of the Tractatus, “strength” is not necessarily only personal, physical or magical might. Organizational abilities, wealth, diplomatic skills, foresight, or the ability to appease the gods to avoid interference; all the skills that can be used to dominate others are seen as “strength”

The Tractatus has seen literally dozens of rebuttals from philosophers of all kinds, from mortalists to clerics of the most disparate religions. Yet, maybe, the controversy has made the book more popular. Slavers, cruel warlords and tyrants use it as a justification, and cite passages from it like others would cite from a holy book. More dangerous are those who have faith in the cult´s teaching and can draw divine strength from them: they can be terrible foes and patient and manipulating villains, always plotting to increase their power and never having the slightest scruple.

Clerics that follow the teachings of Arrhim commonly choose from the Law, Evil, Charm and Nobility domains, though they usually don´t refer to the last one by it´s name and instead call it Tyranny or Dominion.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Knight Otu

First Post
Someone said:
Clerics that follow the teachings of Arrhim commonly choose from the Law, Chaos, Charm and Nobility domains, though they usually don´t refer to the last one by it´s name and instead call it Tyranny or Dominion.
Should that be Law, Evil, Charm and Nobility?
 


Erekose13

Explorer
Hmm we already have one philosophy that has gained enough momentum to start it's own religion ~ Mortalism. I like the idea that we have more than one. I'll have to look over the flavor of those domains and a quick peak at some of the other dieties that we have, but I think this one stands out on its own.
 


BigB

First Post
Arrhim

After reading your proposal I like it. I like the way you wrote up the tractus of peace. I think that we could work the cult and the god (U or Tyrranus) I proposed and come up with some interesting storylines. Maybe the cult is a perversion of the teachings of Tyrannus' clerics...or perhaps Tyrannus himself was a cult member with one difference, freedom was not enough for him - he wanted revenge on the cruel world and is enacting his revenge through tyranny and slavery and gaining power by taking it. Now that Tyrannus is a god his followers and the cult members could be at war or at least have confrontations since their ideals are very similar but different. Arrhim may have been Tyrannus' mentor? Not sure of timeline and history here though.
 

Someone

Adventurer
We could work a way; you could add the philosophy to your god´s fluff, with no (or almost no) changes. I don´t quite like it because of what I commented in your thread: I can´t see much justification in worshipping a god whose ideals include opressing the weaker; and since you´re weaker than him, that means you´re going to be opressed. Who´s going to put himself in such position? Of course, people can agree with the god´s ideals, if they hope to be in a position of power, but not situating themselves in a position where he will be stomped on.

There´s an alternative: he´s a weak god, maybe just ascended, and needs followers. he´s recruiting people with the promise of power to help spread the cult and make himself stronger. In that case, however, there would be little difference between Arrhim and U/Christopher Lee er... Tyrannus
 

Bront

The man with the probe
Well, U or whatever is a fairly new god, having slain one to become one. However, that may be part of the underlying conflict. He wants followers, but Arrhim is approaching him in power and has potentialy more followers (or more fanatical followers). So perhaps the philosophy and the deity would be at war. Evil wars amonsts itself often enough.
 

Someone

Adventurer
The war among evil is a possibility. I had and discarded another couple ideas; the thing is, I really don´t get the concept of worshipping a god of tyranny. so finally the light bulb shone: Arrhim is secretly either the god (in proxy or avatar form) or a devil envoy of his confidence, with the mission of propagating the cult and the god´s ideals.
 

BigB

First Post
Someone said:
so finally the light bulb shone: Arrhim is secretly either the god (in proxy or avatar form) or a devil envoy of his confidence, with the mission of propagating the cult and the god´s ideals.


I like the idea. U (or whatever name ends up) would need Urdiga's help to pull this one off (she is the master of deception) and perhaps Arrhim may actually be working for Urdiga and promoting U's wishes until she feels threatened by him and then she can take control of the cult and deal with him.
 

Remove ads

Top